The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve has left the target federal funds rate at a range between 0 and 0.25 percent, signally no change in its policy to keep the rate at the present level for “an extended period.”
After getting through the opening sentences of the statement, in which the FOMC expresses a somewhat rosy outlook on the economy, comes the real concerns: “Housing starts remain at a depressed level. Financial conditions have become less supportive of economic growth on balance, largely reflecting developments abroad. Bank lending has continued to contract in recent months.” Certainly, the FOMC does not want to add fear to the markets, so it downplays these developments by burying them in the statement. However, the astute reader will note that there remain significant problems with the nascent economic recovery.
The full text of the FOMC statement follows:
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April suggests that the economic recovery is proceeding and that the labor market is improving gradually. Household spending is increasing but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software has risen significantly; however, investment in nonresidential structures continues to be weak and employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. Housing starts remain at a depressed level. Financial conditions have become less supportive of economic growth on balance, largely reflecting developments abroad. Bank lending has continued to contract in recent months. Nonetheless, the Committee anticipates a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, although the pace of economic recovery is likely to be moderate for a time.
Prices of energy and other commodities have declined somewhat in recent months, and underlying inflation has trended lower. With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to be subdued for some time.
The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.
The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will employ its policy tools as necessary to promote economic recovery and price stability.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Elizabeth A. Duke; Donald L. Kohn; Sandra Pianalto; Eric S. Rosengren; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against the policy action was Thomas M. Hoenig, who believed that continuing to express the expectation of exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period was no longer warranted because it could lead to a build-up of future imbalances and increase risks to longer-run macroeconomic and financial stability, while limiting the Committee’s flexibility to begin raising rates modestly.

Geithner, Summers Outline Agenda for G-20 Meeting
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers, director of the White House National Economic Council, are urging leaders from the Group of 20 nations to keep the economy growing by avoiding significant budget cuts. “We must demonstrate a commitment to reducing long-term deficits, but not at the price of short-term growth. Without growth now, deficits will rise further,” the officials wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece.
The op-ed piece defines the struggle central banks and governments face in the current environment between providing sufficient liquidity for the economic recovery with banks and corporations still reeling from the credit crisis and maintaining fiscal responsibility so that the cost of issuing debt does not skyrocket and begin bankrupting whole countries. Europe is worried more about the latter issue than the former. Does anyone believe that the current political and central bank leaders have the competence to walk this tightrope without making severe policy mistakes?
The Treasury Department released the text of the piece as follows:
→ Leave a comment
Posted in Banking, Central Banks, Economy, European Union, Fiscal Stimulus, Market Commentary, Regulatory Reform
Tagged Central Banks, Credit Crisis, Economy, Financial Regulatory Reform, G-20, Group of 20