Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., got a measure into the financial regulatory reform bill written by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., that would force banks to divest their derivatives-trading operations. While the measure could still die, it shows that lawmakers are willing to consider ideas that could seriously affect derivatives portfolios of major banks, according to The Wall Street Journal. The proposal likely would have a number of consequences for banks, bank-stock investors and taxpayers.
Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., suggested he would look closely at a proposal for regulating derivatives hammered out Sunday by Sen. Dodd and Sen. Lincoln. The idea of forcing banks to spin off derivatives trading is strongly opposed by many major banks, which earn billions of dollars yearly on such trading. For bank stock investors, this would be the most damaging aspect of the legislation.
Sen. Judd Gregg, R.-N.H., denounced the proposal as “punitive language put in out of spite,” and dismissed the idea as “pandering populism, which just simply dislikes anything that has to do with Wall Street.”
Gary Gensler, chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, called the Senate’s bill to overhaul financial regulation a “strong product” but did not lend his support to the proposal that would force banks to divest their derivatives-trading operations. Gensler declined to directly comment on the controversial proposal. “I know I’m not answering your question,” he said. “There’s a perverse outcome of this crisis, that somehow the markets perceive that in the next crisis, these large financial institutions, the taxpayers will stand behind them. And we have to sever that belief.”
Yesterday, Senate Republicans voted to block the financial regulatory reform legislation proposed by Democrats from reaching the floor for debate. Republicans said the bill needs substantive changes and that Democrats are rushing it. However, both sides said they expect some form of the legislation to be approved eventually.
Sens. Shelby and Dodd met before the vote, and vowed to continue efforts this week to piece together a compromise agreement. “Our goal is a good bill, a bill that works for the economy, that works for the American people,” Sen. Shelby said. Sens. Shelby and Dodd still disagree on several points, congressional aides said. Sen. Shelby wants other banking regulators to play a role in the new consumer watchdog, a move opposed by Democrats who say that would dilute the proposed agency’s authority.
