A short time ago, this author commented on economic growth rates necessary to begin reducing the overall unemployment rate. In doing so, the column glossed over an acute employment problem, the long-term unemployed, that I would now like to revisit in more detail.
The long-term unemployed are those unfortunate workers who have been out of a job for six months or more. As of February 2010, the long-term unemployed comprise 40 percent of the total unemployed. The average period of unemployment for these long -term unemployed is about 7 months. Only a year earlier, in February 2009, the long-term unemployed constituted only 22% of the total number of unemployed persons, and even that percent was up from its share of the unemployed at the beginning of the recession in December 2007.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Gary Becker notes on his blog that unemployment generally “is concentrated among the young, less educated, and low skilled. For example, according to the March 10th report of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, (seasonally adjusted) unemployment rates in February of this year was 16% for high school dropouts, 11% for high school graduates, only 8% for persons with some college or associate degrees, and a quite low 5% for persons with a bachelor’s degree and higher levels of education.” However, “college educated and older workers constitute a much larger percent of the long term unemployed than they do of the total number unemployed. These differences in long-term unemployment are easy to understand. Many kinds of low paying jobs are available to the young and high school dropouts in all parts of the country. This means that these workers can relatively easily find other jobs if they become unemployed, even though the new jobs may not last so long and they may have to seek still other jobs. Finding other jobs with comparable pay to their old ones is much harder for more skilled and experienced workers since they are more specialized in their knowledge. They may have to move to another region to get suitable employment.”
In addition to the struggles the long-term unemployed have financing their consumption, their plight also has effects on the whole economy. Their rates of consumption drop, they lose confidence in their abilities and their skills deteriorate. The stress of uprooting their families, not to mention the financial stress, also leads to martial problems, “and not infrequently to divorce,” which has social and economic costs of its own.
Becker suggests, and rightly so, that only economic growth will solve the problem. The economy has begun growing again, albeit slowly, and so, unemployment will come down just as slowly, unfortunately. Proposed solutions from Washington, D.C., will either be ineffective or get in the way of economic growth. Becker states, “Regrettably, the decline [in unemployment] may be particularly slow in the present situation because Congress and the President have created too much uncertainty about, among other things, health care costs to employers, taxes on higher incomes and on businesses, taxes on carbon emissions, caps on the pay of some executives, and the new regulations of lenders. Businesses are reluctant to take on many additional employees until they become more certain about their costs, and the direction the economy is moving in.”
Although health care reform is now a reality, businesses will now have to weigh the costs of new hires. Small businesses nearing 50 employees will need to calculate whether it is worth hiring more workers and crossing that health care threshold.
The recently passed Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (H.R. 2847) gives companies a subsidy if they hire workers who have been unemployed for longer than a few months and retain those workers for at least 12 months. Becker comments, “The problem with this proposal [now law as of March 18, 2010] is that the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (or JOLTS-I am indebted to Ed Lazear for bringing these data to my attention-) shows that even during this period of high unemployment, there are about four million new hires every month, and slightly more separations than that when employment is falling. So the great majority of the new hires that would receive a subsidy under such a proposal to stimulate employment would have occurred anyway. The program would end up being another costly subsidy to businesses.”
Transforming the economy, if that is what the President and Congress are after, must come later. For now, the only emphasis should be on stimulating long-term economic growth and getting people back to work. Unfortunately, this is not the path taken by Washington, and the consequential risk of a “double dip” of the economy and worsening unemployment is growing.
To view Becker’s full post, please click on the following link: The Long-Term Unemployed: Consequences and Possible Cures – Becker.

PIMCO Favors Asia-Pacific Bonds to U.S. and European Debt
Faster economic growth and lower risk of political moves that would harm the economic recovery are two reasons why Pacific Investment Management Co. (Pimco) believes investors should buy the debt of companies and governments in the Asia-Pacific region, rather than the debt of U.S. and European companies and governments.
It makes sense to invest where there is the greatest potential for growth, and emerging markets have greater growth potential in the near term. Emerging economies will expand between 11 percent and 13 percent within the next year, while the U.S. economy will grow by no more than 3 percent, according to Pimco estimates.
However, much of the impetus to invest in the Asia-Pacific area is to avoid pitfalls created by the financial crisis. “Politics are going to play a very important role in how an investor looks at asset classes over at least the next 12 months,” said Brian Baker, Pimco Asia’s CEO, in a Bloomberg.com report. “As policymakers withdraw from their fiscal stimulus, and as regulations are put in place in the financial system in the developed world, we run the risk of a policy mistake.”
The Asian unit of Pimco, manager of the world’s biggest bond fund, is focusing on Australian, Indonesian, Philippines and South Korean debt, Baker said. The Newport Beach, California-based firm recommends bonds of Asian companies with stable cash flows and of governments in the region that have adopted “prudent” fiscal and monetary policies to spur growth. Baker asserts that many emerging market countries have maintained better balance sheets than those in developed markets. Many developed market countries, including the U.S., have spent a fortune battling the global economic recession, leaving them with potentially unsustainable debt levels (see Deepening Deficits Around the Developed World at The New York Times).
→ Leave a comment
Posted in Fixed-Income, Foreign Bonds, Investing, Market Commentary, Personal Finance
Tagged Fixed-Income, Foreign Bonds, Investing