Monthly Archives: February 2010

Home Delinquency Rate Drops Slightly, But Remains a Big Problem

The Mortgage Bankers Association said the percentage of home loans in foreclosure along with those behind by one payment was at its highest during the fourth quarter, exceeding 15 percent. However, the delinquency rate for home loans fell from 9.64 percent in the third quarter to 9.47 percent of all outstanding loans as of the end of last year. “This drop in the delinquency rate is good news and shows that the problem may not get much bigger. But it is still a big problem,” an industry source said.

The 30-day delinquency rate showed a sizable drop in the fourth quarter, a strong sign that the market may be seeing the beginning of the end of the unprecedented wave of mortgage delinquencies, according to MBA Chief Economist Jay Brinkmann.  Brinkmann said the drop is important because 30-day delinquencies have historically been a leading indicator of serious delinquencies and foreclosures.

For more on this story, please click on the following link to a Reuters report:  Fewer People Falling Behind on Home Loans

Fitch Ratings Explores the Link Between Unemployment and the Economic Recovery

In a recently released report, Fitch Ratings examines the economic recovery and the conundrum that high unemployment itself is the largest impediment to job creation.  As we have noted on this blog earlier, the key to the economic recovery now may be psychological.  Large corporations, small businesses, employees, and the unemployed all must believe that the U.S. economy can and will grow.  That unique belief in ourselves is what has always driven the U.S. economy.  But when unemployment is so high (9.7 percent officially, 16.2 percent if you add in those that have given up looking), we do not know what Washington is going to throw at us next, and every day some country in the world teeters toward bankruptcy, it is difficult to muster confidence.

Here is Fitch’s summary of the situation:

Although U.S. companies have entered 2010 with cautious optimism that a stronger macroeconomic environment can drive improvements in credit fundamentals, significant structural obstacles are constraining business confidence in the early months of the economic recovery. Chief among these is the historically weak U.S. employment picture and the sober outlook for job creation in 2010 and beyond.

Across most sectors of the U.S. economy, management teams appear wary of the employment-related headwinds that are likely to influence the character of the demand recovery over the next several quarters. With some notable exceptions (e.g., technology firms buoyed by unexpectedly strong consumer and business demand in late 2009), most firms’ 2010 outlooks appear to reflect continuing caution regarding the prolonged impact of an historically weak employment situation on demand and pricing. In general, the prevailing caution surrounding revenue early in 2010 seems to be discouraging planned expansion of capital spending and headcount. Until firms are more confident about the sustainability of a demand recovery, it seems, a sharp reversal in business spending and hiring is unlikely to occur this year.

View full report

If you are having trouble opening the report, please follow this link:
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=500230

Federal Reserve Raises Discount Rate

After the U.S. markets closed yesterday, the Federal Reserve Board announced that it is raising the discount rate (the interest rate it charges banks for emergency loans) by a quarter percentage point to 0.75 percent.  However, the Fed indicated that the move wasn’t a precursor to a broad tightening of credit.

Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, indicated last week that the central bank might increase its emergency lending rate to widen the spread between that and the main policy rate. Still, markets were caught off guard Thursday when the Fed raised the discount rate, prompting officials to say borrowing costs will remain low. “The modifications are not expected to lead to tighter financial conditions for households and businesses and do not signal any change in the outlook for the economy or for monetary policy,” the Fed said. Instead, it said it was encouraging banks to return to private markets as their main source of funds and rely on the Fed only as a backstop.

[FEDjump]

FOMC Minutes: Downside Risks Diminishing; Inflation to Remain Subdued

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) released the minutes of its January meeting, which showed that the Committee believes that downside risks to the economic recovery are diminishing and inflation will remain in check for the next two years.

The staff economic outlook continued to see moderate economic growth for the next two years.  The interesting part was that the staff believed growth would continue in part due to “the accommodative stance of monetary policy and by a further waning of the factors that weighed on spending and production.”  In other words, the FOMC staff does not see the Fed raising rates significantly or pulling back liquidity over the next two years.

As far as the outlook is concerned, the FOMC members generally agreed with the staff outlook.  “Participants expected the economic recovery to continue, but most anticipated that the pickup in output and employment growth would be rather slow relative to past recoveries from deep recessions. A moderate pace of expansion would imply slow improvement in the labor market this year, with unemployment declining only gradually. Most participants again projected that the economy would grow somewhat more rapidly in 2011 and 2012, generating a more pronounced decline in the unemployment rate, as financial conditions and the availability of credit continue to improve. In general, participants saw the upside and downside risks to the outlook for economic growth as roughly balanced.”

In addition, with regard to inflation, the staff believed that price increases for goods and services were likely to remain subdued due to resource slack over the next two years.  However, members’ opinions on inflation are significantly split.  “Participants agreed that underlying inflation currently was subdued and was likely to remain so for some time. Some noted the risk that, with output well below potential over the next couple of years, inflation could edge further below the rates they judged most consistent with the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate for maximum employment and price stability; others, focusing on risks to inflation expectations and the challenge of removing monetary accommodation in a timely manner, saw inflation risks as tilted toward the upside, especially in the medium term.”

This is why what the Fed does over the course of the next year may be the most significant development with regard to economic growth, inflation, and equity and bond markets, outside of what Congress does.  Raise rates and tighten monetary policy too early, and, like 1937, the economy could crash all over again.  Fail to tighten policy soon enough, and like the late 1970s and early 1980s, inflation could run rampant and stall the economic recovery.  Moreover, new asset bubbles may form, as holding cash in an inflationary period is a severe penalty.

To view the FOMC minutes, please click on the following link: Minutes of the Committee meeting held on January 26-27, 2010.

Producer Price Index for January 2010 Leaps 1.4 Percent

The Producer Price Index for Finished Goods rose 1.4 percent in January 2010, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This increase followed a 0.4-percent advance in December and a 1.5-percent rise in November. In January, at the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods climbed 1.7 percent, and the crude goods index jumped 9.6 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods moved up 4.6 percent for the 12 months ended January 2010, their third consecutive 12-month increase.

Before we panic over inflation based on this number, investors should take note that the large increase in prices was almost entirely due to higher energy prices.  The index for finished energy goods rose 5.1 percent in January, its fourth consecutive monthly increase. About two-thirds of the January advance can be attributed to an 11.5 percent jump in gasoline prices. Increases in the indexes for liquefied petroleum gas and home heating oil also were major factors in the finished energy goods rise.

The Fed is not going to accelerate plans to raise rates to fight inflation based on this report.  Energy prices are volatile, and as we will report in an upcoming post on the Federal Open Market Committee minutes from the January meeting, substantial resource slack remains in the economy, and thus demand for energy will likely remain muted, as will inflation.  As proof in the PPI report, just look at prices for finished core goods (ex-energy and food): The index for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.3 percent in January after no change in December. Leading this advance, the index for light motor trucks rose 1.9 percent. Higher prices for pharmaceutical preparations also contributed to the increase in the finished core index.

To see the full PPI report, please click on the “Inflation Measures” page on the menu bar above and scroll down.