Monthly Archives: August 2009

July 2009 PPI Drops 0.9 Percent, Seasonally Adjusted

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the Producer Price Index for Finished Goods declined 0.9 percent in July 2009, seasonally adjusted.  The decrease followed advances of 1.8 percent in June and 0.2 percent in May. 

The decline in producer prices was led by drops in the energy index (-2.4 percent) and in consumer foods (-1.5 percent).  The index for goods other than foods and energy showed a slight decline of 0.1 percent.  Year-over-year, the PPI has dropped 6.8 percent.  Once again, energy and food have paced the decline, with the energy index falling 29.7 percent year-over-year and consumer foods down 4.2 percent over the same period.  The index for goods other than foods and energy rose 2.6 percent from July 2008 to July 2009. 

Commodities, especially oil, spiked from March to June on expectations of a robust worldwide economic recovery (click on Leading Indicators/Oil/Copper/Gold on the menu bar above for more detail).  However, the reality of the situation is that demand is not that great, and has been artificially boosted by government spending programs.  While continued government spending may put a floor on commodity prices, the lack of true private sector demand will also put a ceiling on commodity prices.  Thus, inflation will not be a serious threat for some time – at least not until natural demand picks up.  Deflation is still the enemy, but, again government stimulus programs will likely keep prices afloat (or at least out of free fall) until a real economic recovery gets underway.  Even then, with most growth forecasts showing below-trend growth in major countries for the next couple of years, inflation should be held in check for the foreseeable future.

The full BLS PPI release may be viewed by clicking here.

June 2009 Monthly Bank Lending Survey: Commercial Real Estate Struggling

A monthly survey conducted by the Treasury Department of 22 of the largest bank participants in the Capital Purchase Program (CPP) found that new loan originations increased by 13 percent in June 2009, while outstanding loan balances decreased by 1 percent.  Through the CPP, Treasury invests in viable banks to stabilize the financial system by building up the capital bases of banks, enabling continued lending and economic recovery.  Since the inception of the CPP, Treasury has funded 665 banks of all sizes in 48 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.

The increase in originations was due largely to a sharp increase in new home purchases and seasonal renewals in commercial and industrial (C&I) and commercial real estate loans.  While it is good to see that loans for new home purchases are on the rise, one should not immediately interpret this as a bottom in the housing market.  Remember that the $8,000 First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit per couple expires on December 1, 2009.  Homes must be built and the purchases closed by that date in order to qualify for the loan (click here to read more on this topic).  Thus, new housing starts and new home loans are almost entirely attributable to the tax credit.  Once that expires, assuming it is not extended, we will need to pay close attention to housing statistics to see whether the market is truly repairing itself, or whether the tax credit offered a temporary boost to a still-declining market.

Commerical real estate continues to look vulnerable.  In the CRE sector, the June survey results point to continuing poor market conditions and general caution by businesses. CRE loan balances at these 22 banks fell by 1 percent, and banks reported that demand for CRE loans remained well below normal levels as businesses continue to focus on strengthening their balance sheets, reserving for future losses, and downsizing.  Additionally, the lower demand for new loans reflected a surplus in the market, as the supply of office space has increased due to firms downsizing and office vacancies rising.

Restaurant Investment Review: Consumers Still Need to Eat

No, this blog is not branching out into restaurant reviews, though your humble author is quite the “foodie.”  Rather, with consumers remaining retrenched, perhaps for a long period of time as they continue to focus on debt reduction, a look at where they might be eating out, and which companies may benefit from the dining “trade-down” seems timely.

The restaurant industry has generally done a commendable job of aggressively reducing expenses, thus preserving liquidity, even though same-store sales remain weak.  In its latest “Leveraged Finance Weekly” newsletter [registration and/or subscription may be required], Fitch Ratings reports:

Consumers are likely, however, to continue searching for lower cost alternatives at quick-service restaurants (QSRs) or simply preparing more meals at home if unemployment continues to increase. Year-to-date through June, the Economic Research Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that food-away-from-home sales declined 2.5% from previous year levels. Furthermore, the national unemployment rate was 9.4% in July, up from an average of 5.8% during 2008. As of July 2009, Fitch’s baseline macroeconomic projection is for U.S. unemployment to peak at about 10% in 2010 and then fall modestly in 2011.

When considering investment in restaurants, whether through stocks or bonds, there are at least two factors.  The first is operating margins.  Companies with stronger margins will hold up better in difficult economic conditions.  Below is a look at margins for a few quick-service resturants and casual dining establishments.  The second factor has to do with fluctuations in currency exchange rates.  Most of the companies listed below operate in many countries, which is generally positive because such exposure can diversify economic risk.  However, when converting foreign sales back into U.S. dollars, the company may experience a gain or loss depending on the exchange rate.  The better companies have currency management programs (currency swaps or futures contracts, generally) to deal with this.  McDonald’s is one of the best [disclosure:  the model portfolio for Trafalgar Investment Advisers LLC includes a long position in McDonald's].  Fitch Ratings’ outlook for certain restaurants follows after the margins chart below.

Most Recent Quarterly Margin Comparisons 

Restaurant           Quarter     2009 EBIT Operating Margin (%)    2008 EBIT Operating Margin (%)

Quick Service 

McDonald’s (MCD)          June                      29.8                                                    27.2

Burger King (BKC)          March                   12.7                                                     13.6

YUM! Brands  (YUM)    June                      15.9                                                     11.9

Starbucks Corp (SBUX) June                      8.5                                                       (0.8)

Casual Dining

Darden (DRI)                    May                        9.8                                                        9.5

Ruby Tuesday (RT)        June                       8.9                                                         6.2

Brinker (EAT)                  June                        5.8                                                         0.3

Margin defined as company restaurant revenue less food, labor, depreciation and other restaurant expenses (excludes G&A).  

EBIT = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes

[Source: Fitch Ratings, SEC filings, as-reported data.] 

Fitch Ratings Outlook:

• McDonald’s Corp. (‘A’, Outlook Stable).

• YUM!Brands, Inc. (‘BBB–’, Outlook Stable).

• Burger King Corp. (‘BB’, Outlook Positive).

• Darden Restaurants, Inc. (‘BBB’, Outlook Negative).

 

Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) Unchanged in July 2009, Seasonally Adjusted

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has announced that the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) was unchanged last month, on a seasonally adjusted basis.  Before the adjustment the CPI-U declined 0.2 percent.  Year-over-year, the CPI-U has fallen 2.1 percent, as a 28.1 percent decline in the energy index since its July 2008 peak has more than offset increased of 0.9 percent in the food index and 1.5 percent in the index for all items less food and energy.  So, in real terms, if we remove the exaggerated movement in energy (basically oil prices), inflation is running less than 2 percent, which is the rate the Federal Reserve has set as its target for inflation.  Before the seasonal adjustment, the index declined 0.2 percent, reflecting slight declines in food and energy prices.

For more information, please click on the Inflation Measures page on the menu bar above.

The full BLS release is reproduced below:

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX:  JULY 2009

 CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)

      The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) decreased
 0.2 percent in July before seasonal adjustment, the Bureau of Labor
 Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.  Over the last
 12 months the index has fallen 2.1 percent, as a 28.1 percent decline in
 the energy index since its July 2008 peak has more than offset increases
 of 0.9 percent in the food index and 1.5 percent in the index for all
 items less food and energy.

      On a seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI-U was unchanged in July
 following a 0.7 percent increase in June.  Small declines in the food and
 energy indexes offset a small increase in the index for all items less
 food and energy.  The food index declined 0.3 percent in July with all six
 major grocery store food groups posting declines.  The energy index, which
 rose 7.4 percent in June, fell 0.4 percent in July.  Decreases in the
 indexes for gasoline, fuel oil, and electricity more than offset an
 increase in the index for natural gas.

      The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.1 percent in July
 following a 0.2 percent increase in June.  The indexes for new vehicles,
 tobacco, medical care and apparel all continued to increase in July, and
 the index for airline fares turned up after a long series of declines.  In
 contrast to these increases, the shelter index decreased in July as the
 index for lodging away from home fell and the indexes for rent and owners'
 equivalent rent were unchanged.     

 Table A. Percent changes in CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)

                                     Seasonally adjusted                          

     Expenditure                                                Compound
      Category              Changes from preceding month         annual     Un-
                                                                  rate    adjusted
                                                                 3-mos.   12-mos.
                      Jan.  Feb.  Mar.  Apr.  May   June  July   ended     ended
                      2009  2009  2009  2009  2009  2009  2009 July 2009 July 2009

 All items..........    .3    .4   -.1    .0    .1    .7    .0       3.4      -2.1
  Food and beverages    .1   -.1   -.1   -.2   -.2    .1   -.2      -1.4       1.1
  Housing...........    .0    .0   -.1   -.1   -.1    .0   -.2      -1.0       -.7
  Apparel...........    .3   1.3   -.2   -.2   -.2    .7    .6       4.5       1.1
  Transportation....   1.3   1.9  -1.1   -.4    .8   4.2    .2      22.7     -14.1
  Medical care......    .4    .3    .2    .4    .3    .2    .2       2.8       3.2
  Recreation........    .0    .4    .0   -.4    .0    .5    .0       2.1       1.2
  Education and
     communication..    .3    .2    .2    .3    .3    .2    .3       3.1       2.8
  Other goods and
     services.......    .3    .2   2.7   2.6   -.2    .3    .8       3.3       7.5
 Special indexes:
  Energy............   1.7   3.3  -3.0  -2.4    .2   7.4   -.4      32.5     -28.1
  Food..............    .1   -.1   -.1   -.2   -.2    .0   -.3      -1.8        .9
  All items less
     food and energy    .2    .2    .2    .3    .1    .2    .1       1.7       1.5

      The food and beverages index, which rose 0.1 percent in June, fell
 0.2 percent in July.  The decrease was caused by the food at home index,
 which declined for the seventh time in the last eight months, falling 0.5
 percent.  All six major grocery store food group indexes fell, with the
 largest decreases being a 1.3 percent decline in the index for meats,
 poultry, fish and eggs and a 0.6 percent decline in the dairy and related
 products index, which has now fallen for eight months in a row.  The
 cereals and bakery products index posted the smallest decrease of the six
 groups, falling 0.1 percent.  The indexes for fruits and vegetables, for
 nonalcoholic beverages, and for other food at home all declined 0.3
 percent in July.  The food at home index has declined 2.6 percent from its
 peak in November 2008.  In contrast to the decline in the food at home
 index, the food away from home index rose 0.1 percent in July and the
 index for alcoholic beverages increased 0.3 percent.

      The housing index fell 0.2 percent in July after being unchanged in
 June.  The index for shelter fell 0.2 percent and the household energy
 index declined 0.3 percent.  Within the shelter group, the indexes for
 rent and owners' equivalent rent were both unchanged in July after rising
 0.1 percent in June.  The index for lodging away from home turned down in
 July, falling 2.1 percent after increasing 0.3 percent in June, and has
 fallen 8.9 percent over the past 12 months.  Within household energy, a
 0.9 percent increase in the index for natural gas was more than offset by
 declines in the other indexes, including a 0.6 percent decrease in the
 electricity index and a 1.5 percent fall in the fuel oil index.  The index
 for household furnishings and operations, unchanged for each of the
 previous three months, declined 0.1 percent in July.  For the past 12
 months, the housing index has declined 0.7 percent, with the shelter index
 up 0.9 percent and the household energy index down 14.1 percent.

      After rising 4.2 percent in June, the transportation index increased
 0.2 percent in July.  Most of the moderation was due to the motor fuel
 index, which fell 0.4 percent in July after rising 17.2 percent in June.
 The new vehicle index increased 0.5 percent in July after rising 0.7
 percent in June, and the index for used cars and trucks was unchanged in
 July after rising 0.9 percent in June.  The public transportation index,
 however, turned up in July, rising 1.9 percent after declining 0.5 percent
 in June.  The turnaround was mostly due to the index for airline fares,
 which rose 2.1 percent in July after declining in each of the previous ten
 months.  Over the past 12 months, the transportation index has fallen 14.1
 percent, with several of its components declining.  The gasoline index
 fell 37.3 percent while the index for airline fares declined 16.6 percent
 and the index for used cars and trucks decreased 7.9 percent.  However,
 the new vehicle index has risen 1.2 percent over the past 12 months.

      Among other CPI groups, the medical care index rose 0.2 percent in
 July, the same increase as in June.  Within that group, the index for
 hospital and related services rose 0.7 percent while the index for
 prescription drugs was unchanged.  Over the last 12 months, the medical
 care index has risen 3.2 percent.  The index for other goods and services
 rose 0.8 percent in July after advancing 0.3 percent in June.  The larger
 increase was driven by the tobacco index, which rose 2.2 percent as excise
 tax increases in several states went into effect in July.  The tobacco
 index has now risen 27.8 percent over the past year.  The apparel index
 advanced 0.6 percent in July after a 0.7 percent increase in June.  The
 index for education and communication rose 0.3 percent in July after
 rising 0.2 percent in June, while the index for recreation was unchanged
 in July after rising 0.5 percent in June.

 CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W)

            The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
 Workers (CPI-W) declined 0.2 percent in July, prior to seasonal
 adjustment.  The index value of 210.526 was 2.7 percent lower than in July
 2008.  On a seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI-W was unchanged in July.

 Table B. Percent changes in CPI for Urban Wage Earners and
          Clerical Workers (CPI-W)

                                     Seasonally adjusted                          

     Expenditure                                                Compound
      Category              Changes from preceding month         annual     Un-
                                                                  rate    adjusted
                                                                 3-mos.   12-mos.
                      Jan.  Feb.  Mar.  Apr.  May   June  July   ended     ended
                      2009  2009  2009  2009  2009  2009  2009 July 2009 July 2009

 All items..........    .3    .4   -.1    .0    .1    .9    .0       4.4      -2.7
  Food and beverages    .0   -.2   -.1   -.2   -.2    .0   -.2      -1.6       1.0
  Housing...........    .0    .1   -.1   -.1    .0   -.1   -.1       -.8       -.5
  Apparel...........    .6   1.0   -.3   -.3    .0    .7    .6       5.5       1.3
  Transportation....   1.5   2.0  -1.3   -.5    .9   4.8    .1      25.8     -15.9
  Medical care......    .4    .4    .2    .4    .3    .2    .2       3.0       3.4
  Recreation........    .0    .4    .0   -.3    .0    .4    .0       1.6       1.1
  Education and
     communication..    .2    .2    .2    .2    .2    .1    .3       2.8       2.4
  Other goods and
     services.......    .4    .2   3.9   3.8   -.2    .3   1.0       4.3      10.7
 Special indexes:
  Energy............   1.9   3.6  -3.1  -2.4    .4   8.1   -.4      36.8     -28.5
  Food..............    .0   -.2   -.1   -.2   -.3    .0   -.3      -1.9        .8
  All items less
     food and energy    .2    .2    .2    .3    .2    .2    .1       2.1       1.8

 Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U)

      The Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U)
 decreased 0.2 percent in July on a not seasonally adjusted basis.  The
 index has decreased 1.9 percent over the past year.  Please note that the
 indexes for the post-2007 period are subject to revision.

 Upcoming release

            Consumer Price Index data for August are scheduled for release
 on Wednesday, September 16, 2009, at 8:30 A.M. (EDT).

__________________________________________________________________________________
 Upcoming Changes to the Consumer Price Index news release

    Beginning with the next edition of the Consumer Price Index news release
 scheduled for publication on September 16, 2009, the Bureau of Labor
 Statistics will introduce changes in the presentation of the text section of
 the release.  There will be no changes to the data or to the format and content
 of the tables.  A sample of the revamped Consumer Price Index news release will
 be posted on the BLS Web site on Friday, August 14.  For further information,
 please see http://www.bls.gov/bls/changes_to_text_sections_of_nrs.htm.
__________________________________________________________________________________

 Facilities for Sensory Impaired

      Information from this release will be made available to sensory
 impaired individuals upon request.  Voice phone:  202-691-5200, Federal
 Relay Services:  1-800-877-8339.

 Brief Explanation of the CPI

      The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a measure of the average change in
 prices over time of goods and services purchased by households.  The
 Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes CPIs for two population groups:  (1)
 the CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), which covers
 households of wage earners and clerical workers that comprise
 approximately 32 percent of the total population and (2) the CPI for All
 Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and the Chained CPI for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-
 U), which cover approximately 87 percent of the total population and
 include in addition to wage earners and clerical worker households, groups
 such as professional, managerial, and technical workers, the self-
 employed, short-term workers, the unemployed, and retirees and others not
 in the labor force.

      The CPIs are based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, and fuels,
 transportation fares, charges for doctors' and dentists' services, drugs,
 and other goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living.
 Prices are collected in 87 urban areas across the country from about
 50,000 housing units and approximately 23,000 retail establishments-
 department stores, supermarkets, hospitals, filling stations, and other
 types of stores and service establishments.  All taxes directly associated
 with the purchase and use of items are included in the index.  Prices of
 fuels and a few other items are obtained every month in all 87 locations.
 Prices of most other commodities and services are collected every month in
 the three largest geographic areas and every other month in other areas.
 Prices of most goods and services are obtained by personal visits or
 telephone calls of the Bureau's trained representatives.

      In calculating the index, price changes for the various items in each
 location are averaged together with weights, which represent their
 importance in the spending of the appropriate population group.  Local
 data are then combined to obtain a U.S. city average.  For the CPI-U and
 CPI-W separate indexes are also published by size of city, by region of
 the country, for cross-classifications of regions and population-size
 classes, and for 27 local areas.  Area indexes do not measure differences
 in the level of prices among cities; they only measure the average change
 in prices for each area since the base period.  For the C-CPI-U data are
 issued only at the national level.  It is important to note that the CPI-U
 and CPI-W are considered final when released, but the C-CPI-U is issued in
 preliminary form and subject to two annual revisions.

      The index measures price change from a designed reference date.  For
 the CPI-U and the CPI-W the reference base is 1982-84 equals 100.0. The
 reference base for the C-CPI-U is December 1999 equals 100.
 An increase of 16.5 percent from the reference base, for example, is shown
 as 116.5.  This change can also be expressed in dollars as follows:  the
 price of a base period market basket of goods and services in the CPI has
 risen from $10 in 1982-84 to $11.65.

      For further details visit the CPI home page on the Internet at
 http://www.bls.gov/cpi/ or contact our CPI Information and Analysis
 Section on (202) 691-7000.

 Note on Sampling Error in the Consumer Price Index

      The CPI is a statistical estimate that is subject to sampling error
 because it is based upon a sample of retail prices and not the complete
 universe of all prices.  BLS calculates and publishes estimates of the 1-
 month, 2-month, 6-month and 12-month percent change standard errors
 annually, for the CPI-U.  These standard error estimates can be used to
 construct confidence intervals for hypothesis testing.  For example, the
 estimated standard error of the 1 month percent change is 0.04 percent for
 the U.S. All Items Consumer Price Index.  This means that if we repeatedly
 sample from the universe of all retail prices using the same methodology,
 and estimate a percentage change for each sample, then 95% of these
 estimates would be within 0.08 percent of the 1 month percentage change
 based on all retail prices.  For example, for a 1-month change of 0.2
 percent in the All Items CPI for All Urban Consumers, we are 95 percent
 confident that the actual percent change based on all retail prices would
 fall between 0.12 and 0.28 percent.  For the latest data, including
 information on how to use the estimates of standard error, see "Variance
 Estimates for Price Changes in the Consumer Price Index, January-December
 2008".  These data are available on the CPI home page
 (http://www.bls.gov/cpi), or by using the following link

http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpivar2008.pdf

 Calculating Index Changes

       Movements of the indexes from one month to another are usually
 expressed as percent changes rather than changes in index points, because
 index point changes are affected by the level of the index in relation to
 its
 base period while percent changes are not.  The example below illustrates
 the computation of index point and percent changes.

       Percent changes for 3-month and 6-month periods are expressed as
 annual rates and are computed according to the standard formula for
 compound growth rates.  These data indicate what the percent change would
 be if the current rate were maintained for a 12-month period.

 Index Point Change

 CPI
 202.416
 Less previous index
 201.800
 Equals index point change
 .616

 Percent Change

 Index point difference
 .616
 Divided by the previous index
 201.800
 Equals
 0.003
 Results multiplied by one hundred
 0.003x100
 Equals percent change
 0.3

Regions Defined

The states in the four regions shown in Tables 3 and 6 are listed below.

The Northeast--Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York,
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
The Midwest--Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
The South--Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.
The West--Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

 A Note on Seasonally Adjusted and Unadjusted Data

      Because price data are used for different purposes by different
 groups, the Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes seasonally adjusted as
 well as unadjusted changes each month.

      For analyzing general price trends in the economy, seasonally
 adjusted changes are usually preferred since they eliminate the effect of
 changes that normally occur at the same time and in about the same
 magnitude every year--such as price movements resulting from changing
 climatic conditions, production cycles, model changeovers, holidays, and
 sales.

      The unadjusted data are of primary interest to consumers concerned
 about the prices they actually pay.  Unadjusted data also are used
 extensively for escalation purposes.  Many collective bargaining contract
 agreements and pension plans, for example, tie compensation changes to the
 Consumer Price Index before adjustment for seasonal variation.

      Seasonal factors used in computing the seasonally adjusted indexes
 are derived by the X-12-ARIMA Seasonal Adjustment Method.  Seasonally
 adjusted indexes and seasonal factors are computed annually.  Each year,
 the last 5 years of seasonally adjusted data are revised.  Data from
 January 2004 through December 2008 were replaced in January 2009.
 Exceptions to the usual revision schedule were: the updated seasonal data
 at the end of 1977 replaced data from 1967 through 1977; and, in January
 2002, dependently seasonally adjusted series were revised for January 1987-
 December 2001 as a result of a change in the aggregation weights for
 dependently adjusted series. For further information, please see
 "Aggregation of Dependently Adjusted Seasonally Adjusted Series," in the
 October 2001 issue of the CPI Detailed Report.

      The seasonal movement of all items and 54 other aggregations is
 derived by combining the seasonal movement of 73 selected components.
 Each year the seasonal status of every series is reevaluated based upon
 certain statistical criteria.  If any of the 73 components change their
 seasonal adjustment status from seasonally adjusted to not seasonally
 adjusted, not seasonally adjusted data will be used in the aggregation of
 the dependent series for the last 5 years, but the seasonally adjusted
 indexes will be used before that period.  Note: 47 of the 73 components
 are seasonally adjusted for 2009.

      Seasonally adjusted data, including the all items index levels, are
 subject to revision for up to five years after their original release.
 For this reason, BLS advises against the use of these data in escalation
 agreements.

      Effective with the calculation of the seasonal factors for 1990, the
 Bureau of Labor Statistics has used an enhanced seasonal adjustment
 procedure called Intervention Analysis Seasonal Adjustment for some CPI
 series.  Intervention Analysis Seasonal Adjustment allows for better
 estimates of seasonally adjusted data.  Extreme values and/or sharp
 movements which might distort the seasonal pattern are estimated and
 removed from the data prior to calculation of seasonal factors.  Beginning
 with the calculation of seasonal factors for 1996, X-12-ARIMA software was
 used for Intervention Analysis Seasonal Adjustment.

      For the seasonal factors introduced in January 2009, BLS adjusted 29
 series using Intervention Analysis Seasonal Adjustment, including selected
 food and beverage items, motor fuels, electricity and vehicles.  For
 example, this procedure was used for the Motor fuel series to offset the
 effects of events such as damage to oil refineries from Hurricane Katrina.

      For a complete list of Intervention Analysis Seasonal Adjustment
 series and explanations, please refer to the article "Intervention
 Analysis Seasonal Adjustment", located on our website at

http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpisapage.htm.

      For additional information on seasonal adjustment in the CPI, please
 write to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Division of Consumer Prices and
 Price Indexes, Washington, DC 20212 or contact Jeff Wilson at (202) 691-
 6968, or by e-mail at Wilson.Jeff@bls.gov.  If you have general questions
 about the CPI, please call our information staff at (202) 691-7000.

The PDF version of the news release

Table of Contents

Last Modified Date: August 14, 2009

U.S. Central Bank Holds Key Interest Rate Near Zero

The Federal Reserve Board’s Federal Open Market Committee has announced that it will keep the federal funds rate in a range between 0 and 0.25 percent,  and it “continues to anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.”  The stock market rallied into the statement and lost a little momentum at the end of the day.  Today, stock market futures indicate the rally will continue.  Someday, the market is going to read the Fed’s statement again and understand that this is not news to get excited about.  If this author were to put the Fed’s statement into plain English, it would look something like this: “Although we are relieved that government policies have, so far, staved off a severe economic depression, the recession has taken a heavy toll and conditions have not improved to the point where we can stop offering free money to the financial system.”

For those interested, the full text of the Fed’s release is reproduced below:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in June suggests that economic activity is leveling out. Conditions in financial markets have improved further in recent weeks. Household spending has continued to show signs of stabilizing but remains constrained by ongoing job losses, sluggish income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Businesses are still cutting back on fixed investment and staffing but are making progress in bringing inventory stocks into better alignment with sales. Although economic activity is likely to remain weak for a time, the Committee continues to anticipate that policy actions to stabilize financial markets and institutions, fiscal and monetary stimulus, and market forces will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth in a context of price stability.

The prices of energy and other commodities have risen of late. However, substantial resource slack is likely to dampen cost pressures, and the Committee expects that inflation will remain subdued for some time.

In these circumstances, the Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote economic recovery and to preserve price stability. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. As previously announced, to provide support to mortgage lending and housing markets and to improve overall conditions in private credit markets, the Federal Reserve will purchase a total of up to $1.25 trillion of agency mortgage-backed securities and up to $200 billion of agency debt by the end of the year. In addition, the Federal Reserve is in the process of buying $300 billion of Treasury securities. To promote a smooth transition in markets as these purchases of Treasury securities are completed, the Committee has decided to gradually slow the pace of these transactions and anticipates that the full amount will be purchased by the end of October. The Committee will continue to evaluate the timing and overall amounts of its purchases of securities in light of the evolving economic outlook and conditions in financial markets. The Federal Reserve is monitoring the size and composition of its balance sheet and will make adjustments to its credit and liquidity programs as warranted.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Donald L. Kohn; Jeffrey M. Lacker; Dennis P. Lockhart; Daniel K. Tarullo; Kevin M. Warsh; and Janet L. Yellen.