The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of the U.S. Department of Commerce recently released statistics on mass layoffs for March 2009, and the news shows several industries hitting new highs for the month in mass layoff events. A mass layoff is generally defined as a single event in which at least 50 workers lose their jobs. Manufacturing continues to lead the pace of mass layoffs.
The BLS release is reproduced in part below:
Employers took 2,933 mass layoff actions in March that resulted in the separation of 299,388 workers, seasonally adjusted, as measured by new filings for unemployment insurance benefits during the month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a single employer. The number of mass layoff events in March increased by 164 from the prior month, while the number of associated initial claims increased by 3,911.
Over the year, the number of mass layoff events increased by 1,348, and the number of associated initial claims increased by 137,891. In March, the manufacturing sector experienced 1,259 mass layoff events, seasonally adjusted, resulting in 155,909 initial claims. Over the month, mass layoff events in manufacturing increased by 24, and initial claims increased by 3,291. (See table 1.) Layoff events and initial claims rose to their highest levels on record, with data available back to 1995; events in the manufacturing sector also reached its highest level.
***
Industry Distribution (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
The number of mass layoff events in March was 2,191 on a not seasonally adjusted basis; the number of associated initial claims was 228,387. (See table 2.) Over the year, increases were recorded in both the number of mass layoff events (+1,102) and initial claims (+113,846). This year, both average weekly events and initial claimants reached their highest March levels in program history; data are available back to 1996. (Average weekly analysis mitigates the effect of differing lengths of months. See the Technical Note.) Thirteen of the 19 major industry sectors reported program highs in terms of average weekly initial claimants for the month of March—mining; construction; manufacturing; wholesale trade; retail trade; information; finance and insurance; real estate and rental and leasing; professional and technical services; management of companies and enterprises; administrative and waste services; arts, entertainment, and recreation; and accommodation and food services.
The manufacturing sector accounted for 43 percent of all mass layoff events and 50 percent of initial claims filed in March 2009; a year earlier, manufacturing made up 31 percent of events and 38 percent of initial claims. This March, the number of manufacturing claimants was greatest in transportation equipment (26,012) and machinery (18,081). (See table 3.) The retail trade industry accounted for 8 percent of mass layoff events and 9 percent of associated initial claims during the month.
Have Non-Financial Stocks Been Punished Too Severely?
Posted by rawfinance on April 28, 2009
A column by John Authers, Investment Editor for the Financial Times, examines the relationship between the stock market decline and earnings. When this blog began, it was merely an attempt to document trends in corporate earnings and economic conditions for my own personal use. Although the trend showed some ominous clouds on the horizon, little did this author know that his blog would document one of the biggest stock market crashes of all time. And so, as we all try to feel around in the dark for investing opportunities, and analysts attempt to predict corporate earnings growth, and interesting dynamic has appeared in non-financial companies.
Cutting to the chase, it is well understood that the global economic crisis has been caused by a credit crunch/financial crisis (put simply, banks have been/are in big trouble and needs lots of government money/insolvent). So, as Authers points out in his column:
In other words, financial companies stock prices are more or less reflecting perfecting their current condition, completely discounting future growth. Only a severe shock to the banking system (swine flu, perhaps?) would cause further severe declines in the market. Note, this may seem like a buying opportunity, and perhaps it is, but only, in this author’s humble opinion, for those with high risk-tolerance and an extremely long time horizon – if we use the S&L crisis of the 1980s as an example, banks could be unwinding toxic assets for 5 to 10 years, at least – and that assumes a bottoming in housing prices. Instead, this story is merely the backdrop for a look at the rest of the market.
Authers notes that, “For non-financial companies, however, where earnings also outpaced share prices somewhat during the years of the credit bubble, the picture is different. Morris shows that prices have fallen about 50 per cent from their peak, while earnings have dropped only 14 per cent.”
So, does that mean that the market has oversold non-financial companies? Authers: “The bad news is that shares are predicting a 50 per cent fall in non-financial companies’ earnings. The good news is that this is already priced in. “
While the financial crisis has no doubt spread to the real economy (oil and natural gas prices have tumbled, layoffs are going to extreme levels, consumer spending has severely contracted), the market may have overreacted to how severe the recession would cut into earnings of non-financial companies and underestimated how quickly some companies could prepare. Is there an investing opportunity in the stock market? To answer that, we turn to Bespoke Investment Group, and its analysis of earning beat rates (i.e. percentage of companies that report better than expected earnings):
Earnings Season Beat and Miss Rates
A total of 430 US companies and 156 S&P 500 names have reported their quarterly numbers since earnings season began with Alcoa’s report on April 7th. We’re always monitoring how companies are reporting versus expectations, and below we highlight the percentage of companies beating and missing estimates as earnings season has progressed. At the start of earnings season, more companies were missing estimates than beating, however, this trend has changed significantly as the bulk of reports have come in this week. At the end of last week, 50% of US companies had beaten estimates, and this number has increased every day this week to its current level of 57%. Last quarter only 55% of companies beat estimates, so if we begin to see the “beat rate” increase quarter over quarter instead of decrease, it will be a positive sign for the market.
And stocks within the S&P 500 are reporting even better numbers. Again, after a slow start, the current “beat rate” for the 156 S&P 500 companies stands at 67%. Earnings season still has a long way to go, but the current trend has investors optimistic.
Subscribe to Bespoke Premium to receive more earnings season analysis.
Remember that, when we boil it down to its essence, a company’s share price is essentially a function of two items: (1) earnings per share; and (2) earnings growth expectations. As an example, let’s say XYZ company reports full year earnings in 2008 of $1 per share. Thus, outside of its book value, the stock of the company is worth at least $1. However, it will generally trade at a higher price because the market assigns a multiple to that baseline price. That multiple, the price/earnings ratio, demonstrates the market’s expectations for the company’s growth. Historically, PE ratios for the market average between 15 and 25. At a PE ratio of 15, XYZ company’s shares would trade at $15.
As noted above, the market’s growth expectations for non-financial companies are extremely low. Such expectations set up an environment where companies that report better-than-expected earnings will generally be rewarded by a sharp increase in their share prices, especially those that disclose future guidance on earnings that is positive. Although many considerations go into investing in any company, given the stock market environment for non-financial companies discussed in this article, one may wish to focus on well-managed companies whose PE ratios have fallen below 10. Is this easy? Absolutely not; any investing decision requires homework and a determination of whether the opportunity fits within an individual investor’s portfolio strategy. However, it seems opportunities have arisen.
Posted in Economy, Finance, Investing, Market Commentary, Personal Finance, Stocks | Tagged: Economy, Investing, Market Commentary, Personal Finance, Stock Market | Leave a Comment »