Monthly Archives: March 2009

2009 IRA Contribution Limits

The severe economic recession has some individuals questioning whether they can or should continue to make contributions to an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) (one should note that the official IRS designation for IRA is Individual Retirement Arrangement).  For those who have continued streams of income this year, the answer is generally yes.  Now, it may be better for some to use income to pay down debt rather than save for retirement.  As with any financial decision, the particular facts and circumstances of each individual or household dictate the best course of action.  So no advice, no matter how sound it may be, will ever apply to every situation.  But, generally speaking, contributions to a traditional or Roth IRA (or both) offer great tax advantages toward saving for retirement and should not be abandoned without good reason for doing so.

Contributing to an IRA is one issue, but investing the amounts contributed is what really makes IRAs successful.  The rapid decline in the stock market may be one reason why an individual may no longer see IRAs as a viable retirement planning tool.  However, IRAs are not required to invest in stocks and the accounts are not limited to equity investing. In fact, an IRA may hold a wide range of assets, with some exceptions.  Also, because of the tax advantages, IRAs are better suited to holding certain types of assets, like Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS).  For example, when TIPS increase in value in a tax year due to an increase in inflation, the individual holding the TIPS must pay income tax on the amount of the increase, even though the individual does not actually receive the value of the TIPS increase in that year.  If TIPS are held in a traditional IRA, the tax is deferred, and in a Roth IRA, increases in value are not taxed at all.  Thus, sound investment advice must cover all avenues of retirement planning.

For the 2009 tax year, these are the combined traditional and Roth IRA Contribution Limits:

Individuals under the age of 50 at the end of 2009: The maximum contribution that can be made to a traditional or Roth IRA is the lesser of $5,000 or the amount of your taxable compensation for 2009. This limit may be split between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA, but the combined limit is $5,000. The maximum deductible contribution to a traditional IRA and the maximum contribution to a Roth IRA may be reduced depending on your modified adjusted gross income.

For individuals 50 years of age or older before 2010: The maximum contribution that may be made to a traditional or Roth IRA is the smaller of $6,000 or the amount of your taxable compensation for 2009. This limit can be split between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA but the combined limit is $6,000. The maximum deductible contribution to a traditional IRA and the maximum contribution to a Roth IRA may be reduced depending on your modified adjusted gross income (AGI).

2009 IRA Contribution and Deduction Limits – Effect of Modified AGI on Deduction if You Are Covered by a Retirement Plan at Work

If you are covered by a retirement plan at work, use this table to determine if your modified AGI affects the amount of your deduction.

If Your Filing Status Is… And Your Modified AGI Is… Then You Can Take…
single or
head of household

$55,000 or less

a full deduction up to the amount of your contribution limit.

more than $55,000 but less than $65,000

a partial deduction.

$65,000 or more

no deduction.

married filing jointly or qualifying widow(er)

$89,000 or less

a full deduction up to the amount of your contribution limit.

more than $89,000 but less than $109,000

a partial deduction.

$109,000 or more

no deduction.

married filing separately

less than $10,000

a partial deduction.

$10,000 or more

no deduction.

If you file separately and did not live with your spouse at any time during the year, your IRA deduction is determined under the “Single” filing status.

2009 Contribution and Deduction Limit – Effect of Modified AGI on Deduction if You Are NOT Covered by a Retirement Plan at Work

If you are not covered by a retirement plan at work, use this table to determine if your modified AGI affects the amount of your deduction.

If Your Filing Status Is… And Your Modified AGI Is… Then You Can Take…
single, head of household, or qualifying widow(er)

any amount

a full deduction up to the amount of your contribution limit.

married filing jointly or separately with a spouse who is not covered by a plan at work

any amount

a full deduction up to the amount of your contribution limit.

married filing jointly with a spouse who is covered by a plan at work

$166,000 or less

a full deduction up to the amount of your contribution limit.

more than $166,000 but less than $176,000

a partial deduction.

$176,000 or more

no deduction.

married filing separately with a spouse who is covered by a plan at work

less than $10,000

a partial deduction.

$10,000 or more

no deduction.

If you file separately and did not live with your spouse at any time during the year, your IRA deduction is determined under the “Single” filing status.

2009 Contribution and Deduction Limits – Amount of Roth IRA Contributions That You Can Make For 2009

This table shows whether your contribution to a Roth IRA is affected by the amount of your modified AGI as computed for Roth IRA purpose.

If You Have Taxable Compensation and Your Filing Status Is… And Your Modified AGI Is…

Then…

married filing jointly or qualifying widow(er)

Less than $166,000

you can contribute up to the limit.

at least $166,000 but less than $176,000

the amount you can contribute is reduced.

$176,000 or more

you cannot contribute to a Roth IRA.

married filing separately and you lived with your spouse at any time during the year

zero (-0-)

you can contribute up to the limit.

more than zero (-0-) but less than $10,000

the amount you can contribute is reduced.

$10,000 or more

you cannot contribute to a Roth IRA.

single, head of household, or married filing separately and you did not live with your spouse at any time during the year

less than $105,000

you can contribute up to the limit.

at least $105,000 but less than $120,000

the amount you can contribute is reduced.

$120,000 or more

you cannot contribute to a Roth IRA.

[SOURCE: Internal Revenue Service website, www.irs.gov]

For more information on IRAs, click the following link to IRS Publication 590, Individual Retirement Arrangements.

More Information; New Look

Raw Finance is proud to offer a new page: Economic and Financial Statistics.  Since this author often examines statistics to draw conclusions about the U.S. and global economy for investment purposes, this blog will now offer constant updates of top statistics.  Please visit the Economic and Financial Statistics page by clicking on the link above, or the link on the sidebar under “Pages” often for the latest information.

As a result of the new page, the blog has taken on a new look.  This was necessary to accomodate the sheer volume of new information.  While it is rather plain-looking versus previous incarnations, it is this author’s hope that the reader will benefit more from the content.

Any comments about the new page or the blog in general are greatly appreciated.  Please leave a comment on this post or the new page if you have any suggestions about content (articles, statistics you would like to see, too much information, etc.).  You may also send an email to rawfinance@gmail.com.

Thank you for your continued readership.

Know Your Economic Statistics: Non-Farm Payroll Employment

For prudent investment decisions, stick to leading economic indicators.  The reporting of non-farm payroll employment is important to media outlets because it reflects the plight of workers.  It is a relevant news story.  However, that does not mean it is a relevant leading economic indicator.

Over-the-month change in payroll employment, February 2008-February 2009

[SOURCE:  Bureau of Labor Statistics]

For example, February saw another significant decline in non-farm payroll employment as the recession’s bite worsens.  This makes for stark news headlines, and it certainly shows the serious effects of the recession.  However, payroll employment should not be used as a gauge of future economic activity.  It is not a leading indicator; employment is a lagging indicator.  Payrolls will continue to drop, as they have in prior recessions, long after the economic recovery has begun.  This is why some forecasts for unemployment rising in 2010 to 10 percent or more (the current unemployment rate is 8.1 percent) should not be met with trepidation about corporate earnings and valuations.  In other words, the stock market will not continue to decline because of job losses.  Rather, the market declines because of depressed corporate earnings and poor economic outlooks, which in turn force job reductions.

There are some who would argue that job losses will result in a further decline in consumer spending, and so, corporate earnings will decrease more.  If that were true, then no economy would ever recover from a recession.  Companies would keep cutting workers, who would then spend less, forcing lower earnings, more jobs cuts, less spending, and so on.  This is a phenomenon known as a vicious circle.

We need only look to our present economic situation to see why payroll cuts do not necessarily result in lower consumer spending.  In the Summer of 2008, consumer spending and borrowing began to decline rapidly.  The credit crisis hit its peak in September/October.  Realizing that demand for goods and services had dropped, and that consumers were no longer borrowing to support their spending habits, businesses began job reductions shortly thereafter, and seem to be peaking in the December 2008-February 2009 period.  Consumer spending and borrowing dropped first.  That is a leading indicator.  Job cuts came last, that is a lagging indicator.  And, in the face of the dramatic loss of jobs, the drop in consumer spending may be leveling out (see chart at the end of this article).

There are payroll numbers that we can look to as leading indicators of economic activity:  average weekly hourly earnings and average weekly hours worked.  These numbers show a trend as to income earned on non-farm payrolls.   The analysis is simple:  increased earnings and increased hours means more spending power, with the reverse being true as well.  Let’s look at a chart of these statistics:

Table A.  Composition of change in real earnings of production and
nonsupervisory workers(1) on private nonfarm payrolls
________________________________________________________________________
            |           |           |           |           |
            |  Average  |  Average  |  Average  |    The    |    Real
            |   hourly  |   weekly  |   weekly  |  Consumer |  average
   Year     |  earnings |   hours   |  earnings |   Price   |   weekly
    and     |           |           |           |  Index(2) |  earnings
   month    |___________|___________|___________|___________|___________
            |
            |  Percent change from preceding month, seasonally adjusted
____________|___________________________________________________________
            |           |           |           |           |
2008:       |           |           |           |           |
    Jan.    |     0.3   |    -0.3   |     0.0   |     0.4   |    -0.4
    Feb.    |      .3   |      .3   |      .6   |      .2   |      .4
    Mar.    |      .4   |      .0   |      .4   |      .4   |     (3)
    Apr.    |      .2   |      .0   |      .2   |      .1   |      .1
    May     |      .3   |     -.3   |     (3)   |      .5   |     -.5
    June    |      .3   |     -.3   |     (3)   |     1.1   |    -1.1
    July    |      .3   |      .0   |      .3   |      .8   |     -.5
    Aug.    |      .4   |      .3   |      .7   |      .0   |      .8
    Sept.   |      .2   |     -.3   |     -.1   |      .0   |     -.2
    Oct.    |      .4   |     -.3   |      .1   |    -1.0   |     1.1
    Nov.    |      .3   |     -.3   |     (3)   |    -2.1   |     2.2
    Dec.(p) |      .4   |     -.3   |      .1   |    -1.0   |     1.1
2009:       |           |           |           |           |
    Jan.(p) |      .3   |      .0   |      .3   |      .3   |     -.1
____________|___________|___________|___________|___________|___________

  1 See footnote 2, table 1.
  2 The deflator for the constant-dollar series presented in this
release is the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers (CPI-W).
  3 Change less than 0.05 percent in magnitude.
  p = preliminary.

[SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics]

Take a look at May and June of last year.  While average hourly earnings were increasing, average weekly hours worked dropped.  Also, thanks to incredibly high oil and gasoline prices, inflation was running rampant.  Thus, real earning was declining rapidly.  Those who were paying attention to these numbers would have known that a severe drop in consumer spending was coming.

Now look at October through December.  Average weekly hours have dropped consistently each month, forecasting a worsening in consumer spending.  However, the inflation rate has dropped, thanks to a sharp drop in commodities and, especially, oil prices due to the global economic crisis.  So even though workers were earning less because they were working less, their spending power increased.  January 2009 shows the possibilty of a bottoming in the average weekly hours decline.  Of course, one data point does not make a trend, so we need to see what the next couple of months show before any reasonable predictions may be made.

The bottom line is that investors must know the difference between economic statistics that offer a glimpse into the future and those that merely reflect the past.

Table 1. Estimated Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services, by Kind of Business
(Total sales estimates are shown in millions of dollars and are based on data from the Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey, Monthly Retail
Trade Survey, and administrative records.)
Not Adjusted Adjusted2
NAICS1 Kind of Business 2 Month Total 2009 2008 2009 2008
code % Chg. Feb.3 Jan. Dec. Feb. Jan. Feb.3 Jan. Dec. Feb. Jan.
2009 2008 (a) (p) (r) (a) (p) (r) (r) (r)
Retail & food services,
total ………………………………. 624,162 -10.3 305,943 318,219 392,839 348,876 346,951 346,810 347,191 340,987 379,355 381,421
Total (excl. motor vehicle & parts) … 520,151 -6.9 254,423 265,728 338,355 278,636 280,111 290,023 287,872 283,444 305,148 306,045
Retail …..……………………………. 552,379 -11.7 270,915 281,464 354,475 313,244 312,020 308,148 308,461 302,852 341,729 343,739
GAFO4………………………….………………………….. (*) (*) (*) 84,040 137,393 87,385 84,711 (*) 95,743 93,448 97,659 98,191
441 Motor vehicle & parts dealers ……. 104,011 -24.1 51,520 52,491 54,484 70,240 66,840 56,787 59,319 57,543 74,207 75,376
4411, 4412 Auto & other motor veh. dealers . 92,165 -26.5 45,597 46,568 48,150 64,304 61,063 50,162 52,738 50,952 67,831 69,076
44111 New car dealers ………………. (*) (*) (*) 36,334 38,920 51,188 49,443 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)
4413 Auto parts, acc. & tire stores…… (*) (*) (*) 5,923 6,334 5,936 5,777 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)
442 Furniture & home furn. stores …… 15,241 -13.8 7,520 7,721 9,861 8,822 8,858 8,449 8,392 8,443 9,466 9,670
4421 Furniture stores ………………….. (*) (*) (*) 4,396 4,692 5,063 4,989 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)
4422 Home furnishings stores ……….. (*) (*) (*) 3,325 5,169 3,759 3,869 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)
443 Electronics & appliance stores …… 17,028 -3.7 8,425 8,603 13,828 8,857 8,832 9,217 9,110 8,473 9,346 9,409
44311, 13 Appl., T.V. & camera……………… (*) (*) (*) 6,955 11,060 7,146 7,092 (*) 7,344 6,695 7,522 7,593
44312 Computer & software stores……. (*) (*) (*) 1,648 2,768 1,711 1,740 (*) 1,766 1,778 1,824 1,816
444 Building material & garden eq. &
supplies dealers……………………. 37,576 -14.0 18,547 19,029 22,253 21,783 21,906 24,759 24,810 25,142 27,593 27,480
4441 Building mat. & sup. dealers …… (*) (*) (*) 16,599 19,006 19,264 19,707 (*) 20,569 20,886 23,550 23,715
445 Food & beverage stores……………. 92,752 0.5 44,034 48,718 52,476 45,351 46,981 48,851 49,213 48,273 48,395 48,210
4451 Grocery stores ………………….. 83,808 0.0 39,582 44,226 45,498 40,970 42,843 43,545 44,006 43,167 43,400 43,276
4453 Beer, wine & liquor stores ……… (*) (*) (*) 3,094 4,766 2,976 2,830 (*) 3,589 3,528 3,413 3,397
446 Health & personal care stores ……. 40,907 1.5 20,004 20,903 23,431 20,078 20,219 21,035 20,903 20,865 20,240 20,159
44611 Pharmacies & drug stores ……… (*) (*) (*) 17,368 19,108 16,712 16,968 (*) 17,179 17,230 16,813 16,750
447 Gasoline stations …………………… 48,865 -34.6 23,934 24,931 25,022 36,789 37,914 28,092 27,158 26,422 41,523 41,894
448 Clothing & clothing accessories
stores …………………………….….. 28,953 -5.3 15,078 13,875 27,390 16,128 14,459 18,227 17,739 16,909 18,804 18,981
44811 Men’s clothing stores …………… (*) (*) (*) 663 1,231 722 731 (*) (S) (S) (S) (S)
44812 Women’s clothing stores ……….. (*) (*) (*) 2,283 4,229 2,785 2,570 (*) 2,965 2,949 3,372 3,368
44814 Family clothing stores …………… (*) (*) (*) 5,463 10,789 5,680 5,325 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)
4482 Shoe stores ……………………… (*) (*) (*) 1,662 2,751 1,999 1,744 (*) 2,091 2,124 2,236 2,247
451 Sporting goods, hobby, book &
music stores………………………… 12,863 -1.6 5,733 7,130 11,994 6,024 7,049 7,369 7,351 7,178 7,328 7,436
452 General merchandise stores………. 87,006 0.9 43,622 43,384 69,657 44,205 42,052 50,315 49,686 49,162 49,207 49,071
4521 Department stores (ex. L.D.)…….. 25,929 -7.1 13,228 12,701 27,505 14,490 13,412 16,147 15,973 16,131 17,076 17,134
4521 Department stores (incl. L.D.)5…… (*) (*) (*) 13,038 28,230 14,891 13,790 (*) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)
4529 Other general merch. stores…. .. (*) (*) (*) 30,683 42,152 29,715 28,640 (*) 33,713 33,031 32,131 31,937
45291 Warehouse clubs &
supercenters…………………. (*) (*) (*) 27,618 36,989 26,426 25,504 (*) 30,020 29,497 28,415 28,150
45299 All oth. gen. merch. stores…… (*) (*) (*) 3,065 5,163 3,289 3,136 (*) 3,693 3,534 3,716 3,787
453 Miscellaneous store retailers …….. 16,728 -8.5 8,253 8,475 11,160 9,025 9,253 9,424 9,221 9,298 9,831 10,028
454 Nonstore retailers ………………….. 50,449 -5.9 24,245 26,204 32,919 25,942 27,657 25,623 25,559 25,144 25,789 26,025
4541 Elect. shopping & m/o houses …. (*) (*) (*) 17,435 24,448 16,401 17,507 (*) 18,257 18,123 17,579 17,864
722 Food services & drinking places … 71,783 1.7 35,028 36,755 38,364 35,632 34,931 38,662 38,730 38,135 37,626 37,682
(*) Advance estimates are not available for this kind of business.
(NA) Not available. (S) Suppressed. (a) Advance estimate. (p) Preliminary estimate. (r) Revised estimate.
(1) For a full description of the NAICS codes used in this table, see http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html
(2) Estimates are concurrently adjusted for seasonal variation and for holiday and trading day differences, but not for price changes. Concurrent seasonal adjustment
uses all available unadjusted estimates as input to the X-12 ARIMA program. The factors derived from the program are used in calculating all seasonally
adjusted estimates shown in this table. Year-to-date seasonally adjusted sales estimates are not tabulated. Adjustment factors and explanatory material can be found
on the Internet at http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/mrts.html
(3) Advance estimates are based on early reports obtained from a small sample of firms selected from the larger Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS) sample.
All other estimates are from the MRTS sample.
(4) GAFO represents firms which specialize in department store types of merchandise and is comprised of furniture & home furnishings (442), electronics & appliances (443),
clothing & accessories (448), sporting goods, hobby, book, and music (451), general merchandise (452), office supply, stationery, and gift stores (4532).
(5) Estimates include data for leased departments operated within department stores. Data for this line are not included in broader kind-of-business totals.
Note: Table 3 provides estimated measures of sampling variability. Additional information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error,
sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/mrts.html
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Service Sector Statistics Division
Last Revised: March 12, 2009

Stock Market’s Wild Ride Likely to Continue for Remainder of 2009

For those who enjoy thrill rides, playing the stock market in 2009 is for you.  I know that the market feels like it can only go down.  After all, the S&P 500 Index is down more than 25 percent since January 1, 2009, let alone the carnage of 2008.  But, as any technical analyst can tell you, markets do not behave in such a way as to go from highs to lows and lows to highs (dare to dream) in a straight line.

For instance, the current overall trend is down (as if you had no idea), but there are usually many jumps higher along the way.  For investors who enjoy a little (or a lot) of active tactical trading, such jumps are tradeable rallys.  So when is the next jump higher coming?  Sorry, no one can be sure of the exact day or week when it will begin or how long it will last.  But, from a pure technical perspective the market is currently oversold—a condition which may in the near term result in attracting buyers, thus moving the market higher.

Should we get the “bounce” that I and other technical analysts perceive is coming, do not mistake it for a new bull market, or long-term secular move higher.  The effects of the economic recession around the world have still not been fully accounted for in corporate earnings.  This does not mean that there are no buying opportunities in individual stocks for investors with a moderate- to high-risk profile.  Certainly there are, but they are few.

Speaking of the economy and the stock market, Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at the Stern School of Business of New York University, recently sent out an email summarizing his views. (Note: When you read the portion that he expects the stock market to drop another 40 to 50 percent, please understand that is not from today’s level – he made the comment earlier in the year – instead, look at his predictions for the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average that follow.)

RGE ALERT
RGE Monitor
March 10, 2009

Roubini of RGE Monitor: Stock Market to Go Much Lower

Nouriel Roubini – Chairman of RGE Monitor and Professor of Economics at the NYU Stern School of Business – discusses his recent views on the link between the real economy and stock market performance.

Can we rule out another bear market rally some time in 2009?
No, we cannot rule out another bear market sucker’s rally in 2009, most likely in Q2 or Q3. The drivers of this rally will be the improvement in second derivatives of economic growth and activity in U.S. and China that the policy stimulus will provide on a temporary basis. Given the severity of macro, household, financial firms and corporate imbalances in the U.S. and around the world this Q2 or Q3 sucker’s market rally will fizzle out later in the year like the previous 5 ones in the last 12 months.


What are the downside risks to these bearish predictions for U.S. and global equities?

On the downside there is at least a third probability of an L-shaped global near depression rather than the mere current severe U-shaped recession. If a near depression were to take hold globally a 40% to 50% further fall in U.S. and global equities from current levels could not be ruled out. But in this L-shaped near depression the last thing one would have to worry about would be stock markets as more severe issues would have to be addressed.
What are the upside risks to these bearish predictions for U.S. and global equities?

On the upside, we have an aggressive policy stimulus in the U.S. and other countries that might lead to a faster sustained economic and financial markets recovery that expected here. The bullish argument for a non-bear market and early persistent recovery of global equities is based on a better than expected recovery of the U.S. and global economy.

Bottom Line: P/E and S&P Index
Earnings per share (EPS) of S&P 500 firms will be in the $ 50 to 60 range, but they could fall to $40. The price earnings (P/E) ratio may fall in the 10 to 12 range in a U-shaped recession. If earnings are closer to 50 or the P/E ratio falls to 10 then the S&P could fall to 600 (12 x 50 or 10 x 60) or even to 500 (10 x 50). Equivalently the Dow (DJIA) would be at least as low as 7000 and possibly as low as 6000 or 5000.

Nouriel expounded the above topics further at the CBOE 25th Annual Risk Management Conference at Laguna Beach where he was the keynote speaker. Our audience can download the speech here: part 1, part 2 and part 3.

Read more of Nouriel’s and other RGE Monitor analysts’ views on the current economic and financial situation on www.rgemonitor.com or contact sales at info@rgemonitor.com.

Central Banks Must Act Fast and Forcefully to Avoid Global Long-Term Stag-Deflation: Roubini

A stock market bounce is coming, possibly starting as early as today.  Use it as a trading opportunity to generate some profits, but do not embark on a long-term “buy and hold” strategy because the problems in the global economy are far from over.  In an article posted at RGE Monitor, Professor of Economics at New York University’s Stern School of Business Nouriel Roubini observes the continuing risk of global stag-deflation, and he outlines what we must see from governments worldwide in order to regain any economic (and for this author’s purposes, investing) confidence.

We all know that economic activity in the fourth quarter of 2008 was atrocious.  GDP fell by about 6% in the US, 6% in the Eurozone, by 8% in Germany, by 12% in Japan, by 16% in Singapore and by 20% in South Korea.  The expectation is that the first quarter of 2009 will show less of a decline, or a softening of the recession.  Roubini quarrels with that notion however:

note that most indicators suggest that the second derivative of economic activity is still sharply negative in Europe and Japan and close to negative in the US and China: some signals that the second derivative was turning positive for US and China (a stabilizing ISM and PMI, credit growing in January in China, commodity prices stabilizing, retail sales up in the US in January) turned out to be fake starts. For the US, the Empire State and Philly Fed index of manufacturing are still in free fall; initial claims for unemployment benefits are up to scary levels suggesting accelerating job losses; the sales increases in January is a fluke (more of a rebound from a very depressed December after aggressive post-holiday sales than a sustainable recovery).

Those who believe that the recession is nearing an end will point to the fiscal stimulus packages announced and implemented by the U.S. and China.  However, as this author argued in the previous post on this blog, Roubini observes that without addressing the insolvency of the financial system, any fiscal stimulus or monetary easing is like “pushing on a string.”  As long as credit markets remain frozen, throwing more money at the problem is useless and will only lead to further problems, including handcuffing central banks when they need to be most involved.

Roubini: 

Fiscal and monetary stimulus is becoming more aggressive in the US and China – again less so in the Eurozone and Japan where policy makers are frozen and behind the curve. But such stimulus is unlikely to lead to a sustained economic recovery. Monetary easing – even unorthodox – is like pushing on a string when the problems of the economy are of insolvency/credit rather than just illiquidity; when there is a global glut of capacity (housing, autos, consumer durable, massive excess capacity because of years of overinvestment by China, Asia and other emerging markets) and strapped firms and households don’t react to lower interest rates as it takes years to work out  this glut; when deflation keeps real policy rates high and rising while nominal policy rates are close to zero; when high yield spreads are still 2000 bps relative to safe Treasuries in spite of zero policy rates.

A summary of Roubini’s solutions:

This aggressive and front-loaded and pre-emptive policy response needs to include:

·         massive and more unorthodox monetary policy easing to defrost credit markets even if this may imply central banks widening collateral and taking greater credit risk;

·         massive and front-loaded fiscal stimulus more on the spending than tax side and with income relief to agents with high marginal propensity to spend (poor, unemployed, state/local governments);

·         rapid takeover of insolvent banks – full nationalization – and their quick clean-up and re-privatization;

·         aggressive credit growth incentive for banks and financial institutions to stop the collective action coordination problem leading them to contract credit to even creditworthy households and firms;

·          use of proper and constructive credit forbearance (on capital adequacy ratios, on mark-to-market marks, on rating agencies destructive lagged downgrades);

·         Across the board reduction of the face/principal value of mortgage debt and other consumer debt for insolvent households as a case-by-case debt re-stretching of debt will not work;

·         Immediate doubling of the IMF resources and provision of loans/liquidity to emerging markets under liquidity and financial stress (with conditionality for those economies with severe macro/financial/policy weaknesses; with very light conditionality for the emerging markets with sounder fundamentals).

[SOURCE: The Rising Risks of a Global L-Shaped Near Depression and Stag-Deflation, Nouriel Roubini, RGE Monitor, March 2, 2009]

While this author is not averse to taking some risk in equity markets to take advantage of trading opportunities, such as the current market drop to new lows, one must still proceed with caution and take profits in light of deteriorating economic conditions.  For those who are looking for opportunities to park cash for a longer term, in a safe place with a decent return, the following list may be considered.  These selections are focused on the fixed income sector of the investing universe.  An investor can purchase individual bonds, build a bond ladder, or purchase a bond fund, depending on the level of diversity desired:

Corporate Bonds:

  • Buy individual bonds or build a bond ladder.  Limit options to AAA-rated issuances.  Although interest rates may seem low compared to prior years, take into account the fact that inflation will be limited for the next couple of years.  The profit in these bonds will come in the form of price appreciation. 
  • Buy a fund.  A good option here is the iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond Exchange Traded Fund (symbol: LQD).

Treasuries

  • The short-term (less than 1 year) U.S. Treasury market has been overbought lately by investors seeking a safe haven for their money.  However, there are still opportunities in longer-term Treasury bonds (10- and 20-year maturities)
  • An exchange traded fund option is the iShares Lehman 10-20 Year Treasury Bonds (symbol: TLH)
  • For tax-advantaged accounts, such as IRAs, one may consider buying Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS).  These are currently priced as if there will be zero inflation for the next 10 years.  Since we know that is not likely, TIPS offer not only protection against inflation, but also a good trading opportunity.  Look for announcements in April and July for the next 10- and 20-year TIPS auctions.  Also, this blog will post the information.
  • There is also an exchange traded fund for TIPS: iShares Lehman Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Fund (symbol: TIP)

Municipal Bonds

  • Individual municipal bonds offer terriffic tax-free opportunities.  However, like corporate bonds, investors should not stray away from AAA-rated issuances.
  • Yes, there is an exchange traded fund for municipal bonds too: SPDR Barclays Capital Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (symbol: SHM)

Good luck!  Please send me an email (rawfinance@google.com) if there are any questions or leave a comment here.