Raw Finance

Common sense economic and financial industry analysis for everyone, from banking and investment professionals to individual investors.

Archive for January, 2009

TARP Update; Credit Spreads Ease, But Remain High

Posted by greggkilloren on January 13, 2009

Assistant Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari, in a speech before the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown on January 13, 2009, provided an update on the Treasury’s use of the Capital Purchase Program, a part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), to promote financial stability.  On January 9, 2009, the Treasury executed 43 financial institution investments, bringing the total investment to $189 billion in 257 banks, covering 42 states and Puerto Rico.  On January 14, 2008, the Treasury will post a term sheet for S-corporations [UPDATE: The term sheet has been posted on the Treasury's website] to participate in the Capital Purchase Program.  The application period will begin the same day and remain open for 30 days.

Among the notable portions of Kashkari’s comments was a reference to the LIBOR-OIS spread.  The London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is the interest rate that banks charge each other for three-month loans in U.S. dollars.  The rate is set by a panel of banks in a survey by the British Bankers’ Association each day around noon in London.  LIBOR is also used as a benchmark for approximately $360 trillion of financial products across the globe.  The overnight indexed swap (OIS) rate is an interest rate swap transaction in which the overnight rate is exchanged for a certain fixed rate.  The LIBOR-OIS spread is used by economists and financial analysts as a measure of the availability of cash among banks.  The higher the spread, the fewer available dollars.

Kashkari noted that on October 10, 2008, four days before the $250 billion Capital Purchase Program was announced, the LIBOR-OIS spread had risen to 338 basis points (or 3.38 percent).  To put this in some perspective, in the year leading up to July 31, 2007 (when the earliest effects of what would become the credit crisis first became visible in the subprime mortgage market), the LIBOR-OIS spread averaged 8 basis points.  Today, the LIBOR-OIS spread has eased to 91 basis points.  That is still much more than the pre-crisis average, but much better than 338.  As Kashkari put it, we have avoided a financial collapse.  However, this does not mean that the crisis has subsisded.  In absolute terms, the current LIBOR-OIS spread still indicates a liquidity crisis.

The full transcript of Kashkari’s speech may be read here.

Posted in Credit Crisis, Economy, TARP | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Market Pricing of Default Risk for Financial Companies; An Opportunity in Goldman Sachs?

Posted by greggkilloren on January 11, 2009

According to Bespoke Investment Group LLC, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, both investment banks recently turned bank holding companies, are the most at risk of defaulting on debt within the next five years.

While default risk has dropped dramatically for the financial companies listed below, it’s still interesting to see how the firms compare with each other on the CDS front.  Below we highlight current credit default swap prices for 24 financial firms across the globe.  These prices represent the cost per year to insure $10,000 worth of debt for 5 years.  As shown, default risk is the highest for Morgan Stanley, followed by Goldman Sachs, American Express, UBS, and Citigroup.  The premium against default for JP Morgan is the lowest among US financial firms, with Wachovia, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America not far behind.  BNP Paribas and Credit Agricole have the lowest default risk of the 24 financial firms shown.

Cdsprices

[SOURCE: Financial Company Default Risk; Think B.I.G. blog; Bespoke Investment Group, January 9, 2009]

While it is generally unwise to fight market perception, occasionally investing opportunities arise when the market remains skeptical following a near-calamity such as the credit crisis.  Goldman Sachs’ corporate bonds may present such an opportunity.  Among investment banks, Goldman had long been the strongest and most respected.  The credit crisis nearly undid the company, forcing it to become a bank holding company in order to gain access to federal government borrowing.  On the heels of that conversion in September 2008, Warren Buffett, via Berkshire Hathaway, invested $5 billion in Goldman by purchasing preferred shares with a 10 percent dividend yield and receiving warrants to purchase $5 billion in common stock at $115 per share ($10 below the per share price at the time; GS share price closed at $83.72 on 01-09-2009) .  The preferred shares are callable within 5 years.  The deal allowed Goldman to maintain its operations until the credit markets returned to some type of normalcy.  When Goldman can borrow at a more favorable rate, it will do so and pay off the Berkshire Hathaway preferred shares.

Given that credit spreads are coming down and Goldman does not have great exposure to what are sure to be the next two financial problem areas, credit card debt and commercial real estate mortgage defaults, an investment in Goldman Sach’s corporate bonds may make some sense.  There are two caveats though: (1) Consider bonds that have a maturity of less than 5 years to limit time exposure to the company in the event the economy does not turn around; and (2) make sure that the bond prices have not jumped already in anticipation of an improved Goldman balance sheet, thus reducing the yield on the bond.  In addition, please note that this is not an argument for purchasing common stock in Goldman.  I still believe that financials stocks are too unpredictable for such an investment.

Below is one example of a Goldman Sach’s corporate issue an investor may want to consider.  This bond was recently trading at approximately $102 (or a $2 premium to face value), which would lower the yield to approximately 6 percent.  Still, that is an excellent yield, and one would only be exposed to Goldman for two years.  Also, I expect the price of this bond to increase as confidence in Goldman returns, so there is the prospect of selling the bond for a profit, rather than holding it to maturity:

GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 6.87500% 01/15/2011NT

CUSIP 38141GAZ7
ISIN US38141GAZ72
SEDOL
Pay Frequency SEMI-ANNUALLY
Coupon 6.875
Maturity Date 01/15/2011
Moody’s Rating A1
S&P Rating A
Issuer Events YES
Call Protection YES
Sinking Fund Protection YES
Put Option NO
Bond Type Corporate
Sector FINANCE (NON-BANK)
Interest Accrual Date 01/16/2001

Posted in Fixed-Income, Investing, Market Commentary | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Investing 2009 and Beyond: Stay Safe and Seek Sound Advice

Posted by greggkilloren on January 10, 2009

One of my greatest concerns about investing for retirement is that the term “investing” has become synonymous with buying stocks with 100 percent of one’s portfolio.  No matter what one’s age, goals, or risk tolerance is, having one’s investment portfolio entirely exposed to the stock market is too high a risk with too low a potential reward.  I hope that if the experience of 2008 has taught us anything, it is that investing requires allocating a portfolio to fixed income, equities, and cash in proportion with the account holder’s age, goals, and risk tolerance.  Investing also requires constant monitoring and re-evaluation.

Seek Out Advice

For those who do not have the time or inclination to handle retirement planning, I strongly suggest seeking out an investment advisor.  An investment advisor is not a stock broker, and any investment advisor that only invests in the stock market is not truly an advisor.  In addition, stock brokers earn a commission on trades made, investment advisors generally charge an annual fee constituting a small percentage of the portfolio total.  Please note, I am not disparaging stock brokers – for those investors who would like to have an account solely devoted to equity investing, there are many good brokers in the industry.  However, a stock broker is not the best manager for one’s overall retirement planning.

My concern is that there are individuals holding themselves out to be investment advisors whose counsel is little different from that of a stock broker.  When looking for help with your retirement planning, make sure that your advisor discusses your goals and risk tolerance and builds a portfolio to reflect those.  Also, trust the advisor who speaks in plain terms, clearly explains what he or she plans to do with your portfolio, responds to your calls in a timely manner, and avoids using Wall Street speak like “they/we/I like XYZ stock” – “over an x-year period, the stock market always outperforms other investments” – “you must be in the market at all times or you will miss the rally.”

Earnings Season Begins This Week: Tread Carefully

The S&P 500 has rallied from its low in November 2008 by approximately 20 percent.  Earnings reports for the fourth quarter of 2008, and given what we know about the economy, those reports are expected to be terrible.  The question for the market in 2009 is will earnings improve, and if so, by how much.  So, there will be two facets of the earnings reports that will move the market:

  1. Earnings that are significantly better or significantly worse than expectations will have an immediate impact on a stock’s price;
  2. The outlook provided by the company for future earnings may take precedence over the current report.

Trading volume for the first full week of trading has been light, as it has been since the end of November.  This partially explains the drop in volatility, which has been welcome.  However, expect some volatility to return with the earnings reports.  Over the next few months, earnings-season volatility will cause headaches as individual stock prices gyrate while investors digest the earnings reports and outlooks.

Over the longer-term, what happens in Washington will determine the economic outlook for 2010.  The results of any stimulus package will not been seen for about 12 months.  The stock market, however, is generally forward-looking, and so, the economic outlook for 2010 will likely drive the market in the second half of 2009.  Although the U.S. and other world governments seem to be doing whatever it takes to avoid an economic calamity, these stimulus programs are largely experimental.  Actions have consequences, and we cannot imagine what the consequences of the various stimulus packages may be.  The best we can do is watch the economic numbers carefully and draw the best inferences possible from those numbers.

What does this all mean?  Well,  no one can honestly say.  That is the most serious risk in investing the market today—there is still little earnings visibility and the economic picture is unclear.  Without being able to determine future earnings capability within a reasonable range, there is no way to put a reasonable value on the stock market.  And so, we could see a year where the market is down 20 percent at one point, up 20 percent at another, and yet ultimately end up right where it began.

What Can We Do?

The slogan for 2008 was “preserve capital.”  Hopefully you have done that.  The mantra for 2009 is “slow and steady.”

In 2008, the best move was to get out of the stock market and stay out.  No sector was immune from the downturn, and the best stocks simply held their value for the year.  In 2009, we need to put the cash raised in 2008 to work, but safety is still paramount.  A good portion of one’s portfolio should be allocated to fixed income: municipal and corporate bonds.  Treasuries have been overbought in the worldwide rush to safety, and so it hard to recommend an asset that offers almost no, and for shorter term bonds exactly no, return.  However, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities may offer good returns in the future if inflation returns.

Another portion of one’s portfolio can be allocated to the stock market.  However, this should come in the form of trading in and out of specific stocks with a goal of taking profits and keeping losses small.  Thus, one should always have a cash position in this portion of the portfolio to take advantage of opportunities or to dollar-cost average one’s position in the event a stock’s price drops soon after the initial purchase (but does not fall through the stop price).  In other words, when it comes to stock market investing this year, be nimble and be safe.

There are plenty of posts on this blog that detail the themes raised in this post.  I have compiled a list of those posts and their respective topics below:

Currency: The State of the U.S. Dollar

Corporate Earnings: Corporate Default Rate Pushing Up Cost of Financing for Healthy Companies

Credit Crisis: Credit Crisis- A Brief History and Time Line

Deleveraging: The Wolf is at The Door

Economy: Consumer Spending Will Not Bounce Back

Inflation/Deflation:  Disinflation/Inflation/Deflation and Fiscal Stimulus: A Look at 2009

Inflation/Deflation: Economic Roundup (Week of 11-17-08 to 11-21-08): The New Vocabulary Word is Stag-Deflation

Investing: New Mindset Needed for Stock Market Investing

Investing: Fixed-Income Investing: CDs, Money Markets, Treasuries, Municipal and Corporate Bonds

Market Phenomena: Dynamics of a Market Bubble

Stock Market Investing: Managed Funds Do Not Outperform Index Funds


Posted in Fixed-Income, Investing, Market Commentary, Personal Finance, Stocks | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

524,000 Jobs Lost in December 2008: BLS

Posted by Gregg Killoren on January 9, 2009

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has released its employment report for December 2008,  showing that the unemployment rate rose to 7.2 percent.  The following is an excerpt from the report:

Nonfarm payroll employment declined sharply in December, and the unemployment
rate rose from 6.8 to 7.2 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S.
Department of Labor reported today.  Payroll employment fell by 524,000 over the
month and by 1.9 million over the last 4 months of 2008.  In December, job losses
were large and widespread across most major industry sectors.
  
Unemployment (Household Survey Data)
  
   In December, the number of unemployed persons increased by 632,000 to 11.1 mil-
lion and the unemployment rate rose to 7.2 percent.  Since the start of the reces-
sion in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has grown by 3.6 million,
and the unemployment rate has risen by 2.3 percentage points.  (See table A-1.)
  
   The unemployment rates for adult men (7.2 percent), adult women (5.9 percent),
and whites (6.6 percent) increased in December.  The jobless rates for teenagers
(20.8 percent), blacks (11.9 percent), and Hispanics (9.2 percent) were little
changed over the month.  The unemployment rate for Asians was 5.1 percent in Decem-
ber, not seasonally adjusted. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)
  
   Among the unemployed, the number of job losers and persons who completed tempo-
rary jobs rose by 315,000 to 6.5 million in December.  Over the past 12 months, the
size of this group has increased by 2.7 million.  (See table A-8.)  The number of
long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) rose to 2.6 million in
December and was up by 1.3 million in 2008.  (See table A-9.)

Click here to read the full report.

Posted in Economy | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Bank of England Slashes Interest Rate to Historic Low

Posted by greggkilloren on January 9, 2009

On January 8, 2009, the Bank of England (BOE), dealing with a rapidly deteriorating economy, cut its benchmark interest rate by .5 percent to 1.5 percent.  While the move was expected, it is notable as the 1.5 percent rate is the lowest in the bank’s history.  Keep in mind, English history is much longer than ours in the United States – the Bank of England has been in operation since 1694.  Considering that we often compare financial history in terms of 10-year highs and lows, the BOE’s move should be met with grave concern.  How bad does the world economy need to be for a major central bank to drop its rate to a 300+ year low?

Here are a few answers:

Wharton finance professor Franklin Allen “points out that Europe is experiencing a deep recession, especially in the United Kingdom.  Germany, Spain and Ireland have also been hit hard, although France is holding up a little better because greater state involvement in the economy is somewhat cushioning citizens from the downturn. Italy, despite long-term structural problems in the economy, is also fairing relatively well at the moment because of low levels of debt.
Europe, he adds, is likely to experience deflation, but will keep interest rates at 1.5% or 2%, while the United Kingdom will be more aggressive and may let rates fall to zero percent or 0.25%.  Low rates have advantages and disadvantages, he says: While they help soften the impact of recession, they can delay recovery.
Around the world, emerging markets in Latin America, India and China are still growing, but at lower rates – exposing some underlying problems in their economies.”

[SOURCE: Global Economic Forecast for 2009: Will Demand for Good News Outpace Supply? Knowledge@Wharton, January 7, 2009]

BNP Paribas on the UK’s economy: “Given worsening survey and hard data we have adjusted down our GDP forecast. We now expect GDP to contract by 3% on average during 2009, with a low-point of -3.5% [year-over-year] during Q2-2009. We see virtually zero growth during 2010.

[SOURCE: UK: From Hero to Zero, Allen Clarke, BNP Paribas Daily Economic Spotlight, December 19, 2008]

According to analysts at RGEMonitor, the decline in U.S. exports will accelerate in 2009:

Exports contraction that began in late 2008 will gain pace in 2009 as more and more emerging economies slip into slowdown following the G-7 countries.  On the other hand, easing oil prices and secular downward trend in consumer spending and business investment will help imports to shrink.  In fact, this might cause the trade deficit to contract in 1H 2009 since the contraction in imports might well exceed the decline in exports, thus containing any negative contribution of trade to GDP growth.

[SOURCE: RGE Monitor - 2009 U.S. Economic Outlook, Christian Menegatti, Arpitha Bykere, Elisa Parisi-Capone and Mikka Pineda, January 7, 2009, RGEMonitor.com]

Posted in Bank of England, Central Banks, Economy | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »