Assistant Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari, in a speech before the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown on January 13, 2009, provided an update on the Treasury’s use of the Capital Purchase Program, a part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), to promote financial stability. On January 9, 2009, the Treasury executed 43 financial institution investments, bringing the total investment to $189 billion in 257 banks, covering 42 states and Puerto Rico. On January 14, 2008, the Treasury will post a term sheet for S-corporations [UPDATE: The term sheet has been posted on the Treasury's website] to participate in the Capital Purchase Program. The application period will begin the same day and remain open for 30 days.
Among the notable portions of Kashkari’s comments was a reference to the LIBOR-OIS spread. The London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is the interest rate that banks charge each other for three-month loans in U.S. dollars. The rate is set by a panel of banks in a survey by the British Bankers’ Association each day around noon in London. LIBOR is also used as a benchmark for approximately $360 trillion of financial products across the globe. The overnight indexed swap (OIS) rate is an interest rate swap transaction in which the overnight rate is exchanged for a certain fixed rate. The LIBOR-OIS spread is used by economists and financial analysts as a measure of the availability of cash among banks. The higher the spread, the fewer available dollars.
Kashkari noted that on October 10, 2008, four days before the $250 billion Capital Purchase Program was announced, the LIBOR-OIS spread had risen to 338 basis points (or 3.38 percent). To put this in some perspective, in the year leading up to July 31, 2007 (when the earliest effects of what would become the credit crisis first became visible in the subprime mortgage market), the LIBOR-OIS spread averaged 8 basis points. Today, the LIBOR-OIS spread has eased to 91 basis points. That is still much more than the pre-crisis average, but much better than 338. As Kashkari put it, we have avoided a financial collapse. However, this does not mean that the crisis has subsisded. In absolute terms, the current LIBOR-OIS spread still indicates a liquidity crisis.
The full transcript of Kashkari’s speech may be read here.

Market Pricing of Default Risk for Financial Companies; An Opportunity in Goldman Sachs?
Posted by greggkilloren on January 11, 2009
According to Bespoke Investment Group LLC, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, both investment banks recently turned bank holding companies, are the most at risk of defaulting on debt within the next five years.
[SOURCE: Financial Company Default Risk; Think B.I.G. blog; Bespoke Investment Group, January 9, 2009]
While it is generally unwise to fight market perception, occasionally investing opportunities arise when the market remains skeptical following a near-calamity such as the credit crisis. Goldman Sachs’ corporate bonds may present such an opportunity. Among investment banks, Goldman had long been the strongest and most respected. The credit crisis nearly undid the company, forcing it to become a bank holding company in order to gain access to federal government borrowing. On the heels of that conversion in September 2008, Warren Buffett, via Berkshire Hathaway, invested $5 billion in Goldman by purchasing preferred shares with a 10 percent dividend yield and receiving warrants to purchase $5 billion in common stock at $115 per share ($10 below the per share price at the time; GS share price closed at $83.72 on 01-09-2009) . The preferred shares are callable within 5 years. The deal allowed Goldman to maintain its operations until the credit markets returned to some type of normalcy. When Goldman can borrow at a more favorable rate, it will do so and pay off the Berkshire Hathaway preferred shares.
Given that credit spreads are coming down and Goldman does not have great exposure to what are sure to be the next two financial problem areas, credit card debt and commercial real estate mortgage defaults, an investment in Goldman Sach’s corporate bonds may make some sense. There are two caveats though: (1) Consider bonds that have a maturity of less than 5 years to limit time exposure to the company in the event the economy does not turn around; and (2) make sure that the bond prices have not jumped already in anticipation of an improved Goldman balance sheet, thus reducing the yield on the bond. In addition, please note that this is not an argument for purchasing common stock in Goldman. I still believe that financials stocks are too unpredictable for such an investment.
Below is one example of a Goldman Sach’s corporate issue an investor may want to consider. This bond was recently trading at approximately $102 (or a $2 premium to face value), which would lower the yield to approximately 6 percent. Still, that is an excellent yield, and one would only be exposed to Goldman for two years. Also, I expect the price of this bond to increase as confidence in Goldman returns, so there is the prospect of selling the bond for a profit, rather than holding it to maturity:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 6.87500% 01/15/2011NT
Posted in Fixed-Income, Investing, Market Commentary | Tagged: Finance, Fixed-Income Investing, Investing, Market Commentary, Personal Finance | Leave a Comment »