Raw Finance

Common sense economic and financial industry analysis for everyone, from banking and investment professionals to individual investors.

Archive for December, 2008

Commerical Real Estate Developers Seek Bailout Money

Posted by greggkilloren on December 23, 2008

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, commercial real estate developers have asked Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. to be included in a recently announced $200 billion loan program designed to help prop up lending for automobiles, credit cards and student loans by helping investors to buy securities backed by such loans.  According to research firm Foresight Analytics LLC, $530 billion will need to be refinanced in the next three years.  The reason is that most commercial mortgages expire anywhere from 3 to 10 years, even though the payments may be amortized over a period between a 15 and 30 years.  This allows banks to adjust to interest rate conditions by forcing the borrower to refinance periodically.  However, as the credit crisis has spread, there may not be enough lending available to refinance all of the commerical mortgages, resulting in defaults and foreclosures that would devastate commercial real estate prices.

 

[Commercial Blues]

 

 Paul Jackson at HousingWire.com noted that a report released on December 22, 2008, by real estate firm Reis, Inc., indicated that commercial mortgage defaults could triple in 2009, despite rental income falling only 5 percent, due to the dearth of financing.  Jackson also mentions that ratings firm Moody’s Investor Service last week warned that “$110 billion in US CRE-backed CDOs now face possible multi-notch downgrades due to deteriorating market conditions.”

Thus, commercial real estate, like credit cards, may be another problem area we should watch closely in 2009.  A deterioration in commercial real estate would further damage banks’ balance sheet and lead to a worsening of the credit crisis and, consequently, the macro economy.

Posted in Commercial Real Estate, Economy | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Dynamics of a Market Bubble

Posted by Gregg Killoren on December 22, 2008

Bespoke Investment Group LLC has an insightful look at how market bubbles form and then burst on its blog.  The lesson is that when the bubble bursts, there is often little time to get out before all of the gains are lost.

Bubbles: The More They Go Up, The More They Go Down

The carnage continues for oil this morning as the commodity is currently trading in the low $30s.  As shown in the first chart below, after rallying 732.6% from its low of $17.45 in 2001 to its high of $145.29 this July, oil is now down an astounding 76.1% from its peak.  In the past, we’ve compared the oil bubble with the Nasdaq and homebuilder bubbles.  At its current price of $34 and change, oil only needs to fall another $2 to see the same declines that the Nasdaq saw during the bursting of its bubble.  The only difference is that it took years for the Nasdaq to reach its lows, while oil has declined by almost as much in just a few months.  Back in September, we highlighted our bubble comparison and suggested that oil in the $30s wouldn’t happen until 2011 if it took the same track as prior bubbles.  At -76.1% in 5 months, oil’s fall, like the drop in the Baltic Dry Index, is one of the most extreme bubble bursts in history.

Oil01present 

Below we compare the inverse of oil during its runup from 9/01 to 7/08 with the regular price of oil from 7/08 to present.  Our goal here is to show how much quicker assets usually decline than they go up.  It took more than 1600 trading days for oil to reach its highs and just a little more than 100 to move back down close to its lows.

Oilinverse 

[SOURCE: Bubbles, The More They Go Up,  The More They Go Down, Bespoke Investment Group LLC, December 19, 2008.]

Posted in Finance, Market Commentary | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Standard and Poor’s Downgrades Banks’ Credit Ratings

Posted by Gregg Killoren on December 19, 2008

On the heels of Morgan Stanley’s worse-than-expected loss in the fourth-quarter 2008 (-$2.34 per share vs. analysts’ expectations of -$0.34 per share, for more see The Wall Street Journal‘s article), rating agency Standard and Poor’s (S&P) announced that it has cut the credit ratings and/or outlook of 12 financial companies.  In one respect, S&P is simply recognizing what has been obvious to most of us: the financial industry is in trouble and it is not going to recover quickly.  The real concern with such an announcement is what it does to confidence in financial companies.

Credit spreads had been declining as some confidence had been restored to the financial industry.  Confidence may not be the right term—it may be fairer to say that the threat of an absolute collapse in the financial industry had passed as the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department finally acted strongly in October and November to prevent such a collapse.  Consider the chart below [courtesy of the Federal Reserve}:

Week Ending   2008
                  Instruments                 Dec    Dec    Dec     Dec    Dec    Dec    Dec    Nov   Oct
                                               8      9      10     11      12     12     5
   Federal funds (effective) 1 2 3            0.12   0.13   0.11    0.14   0.15   0.13   0.49   0.39  0.97
   Commercial Paper 3 4 5 6
      Nonfinancial
         1-month                              0.51   0.28   n.a.    0.28   0.15   0.31   0.45   0.61  1.55
         2-month                              0.46   0.43   n.a.    n.a.   n.a.   0.45   0.92   1.28  1.82
         3-month                              0.50   n.a.   n.a.    n.a.   n.a.   0.50   1.27   1.45  2.07
      Financial
         1-month                              0.55   0.79   0.34    0.41   0.55   0.53   1.25   1.29  2.77
         2-month                              n.a.   n.a.   n.a.    n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   1.29   1.50  2.96
         3-month                              n.a.   n.a.   n.a.    n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   1.42   1.54  3.19

The spreads on commercial paper have come down dramatically since the height of the crisis in October as the Fed has lowered the federal funds rate and pumped money into the system via programs like the Term Auction Facility and the Commercial Paper Funding Facility.  Financial commercial paper remains more expensive than non-financial, but it has improved.  Although S&P’s downgrade is warranted, as usual it is behind the curve.  Hopefully, the market will recognize this for what it is and not allow the downgrade to instill another round of doubt and panic about financials.

Here are the details on S&P’s ratings downgrades:

RATINGS LIST
Bank                      New Rating        Prior Rating
Bank of America N.A.      AA-/Negative/A-1+ AA/Watch Neg/A-1+
Barclays Bank PLC         AA-/Negative/A-1+ AA/Watch Neg/A-1+
Citibank N.A. New York, NY
                          A+/Stable/A-1     AA/Watch Neg/A-1+
Credit Suisse             A+/Stable/A-1     AA-/Watch Neg/A-1+
Deutsche Bank AG          A+/Stable/A-1     AA-/Negative/A-1+
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.* A/Negative/A-1    AA-/Negative/A-1+
HSBC Bank PLC             AA/Negative/A-1+  AA/Stable/A-1+
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.  AA-/Negative/A-1+ AA/Negative/A-1+
Morgan Stanley*           A/Negative/A-1    A+/Negative/A-1
Royal Bank of Scotland PlC (The)
                          A+/Stable/A-1     AA-/Stable/A-1+
UBS AG                    A+/Stable/A-1     AA-/Watch Neg/A-1+
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.     AA+/Negative/A-1+ AAA/Watch Neg/A-1+

If anyone would like more details on S&P's action, the press release may be read here.

Posted in Credit Crisis, Economy | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Global Economy Is Entering Stag-Deflation: Roubini

Posted by Gregg Killoren on December 17, 2008

Since I have been  busy dodging snow storms and paying attention to my day job (which has been enhanced by the financial crisis), I have not been able write as much as I would like here.  There are many important developments on the economic front, and it seems that each day, another factor arises or changes, which in turn alters the outlook.  In the absence of my own analysis today, I would like to highlight an article written by Professor Nouriel Roubini.  My outlook for 2009 is admittedly dark, but I do see the possibility of a very narrow path that, with the right government intervention, the economy could travel where we would not fall into a deflationary spiral.  Professor Roubini does not share my, albeit slight, optimism.

Here is a bullet point summary of the article:

  • The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has jumped from $800 billion to more than $2 trillion as it lowers the federal funds target rate to a range between 0 and .25 percent
  • Despite the unorthodox moves by the Fed, the U.S. and global economy risks a protracted bout of stag-deflation (anemic economic growth among falling prices in all asset classes)
  • The U.S. recession will likely last until December 2009, with cumulative GDP likely falling more than 5 percent;
  • Unless there is aggressive fiscal policy that includes a recapitalization of banks, the recession could morph into a Japansese-style “L” shape (a steep economic decline followed by a long period of zero growth)
  • A recession in Russia in 2009 and a “near recession” (zero growth) in Brazil
  • A sharp slowdown in what was white-hot growth in India and China; China’s GDP could fall to 5 percent, a much more rapid decline than currently expected [trade tip: ProShares Ultra Short FTSE/Xinhua China 25 (ticker symbol: FXP) gains in value at 2x the rate of declines in the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 index]
  • More aggressive policy actions may be undertaken by the Fed as a severe credit crunch shows no signs of relenting.

If you are interested, you may read the full article here.

[SOURCE: Helicopter Ben goes ZIRP, QE and More…While the Global Economy Enters Stag-Deflation, Nouriel Roubini, RGEMonitor.com

Posted in Economy, Market Commentary | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Fed Fights Recession by Dropping Target Rate to Near Zero

Posted by greggkilloren on December 16, 2008

Consumer Price Index Drops

To begin, before the Fed offered its surprise news today, there was some important news on inflation this morning.  A big drop in the Consumer Price Index reported this morning, followed by the Federal Reserve Board’s announcement of a drop in the federal funds rate to a target between zero and .25 percent, punctuated the fight against falling prices that has been triggered by the global credit crisis.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI) declined by a seasonally-adjusted 1.7 percent in November 2008 – year-over-year, however, the CPI increased by 1.1 percent.  The decline in prices was due entirely to a drop in energy prices, most notably gasoline.  The BLS noted that the gasoline index fell 29.5 percent in November and gas prices are now 47 percent below their July peak.  Food prices rose 0.2 percent in November.  The “core” CPI (that is, excluding food and energy prices) was flat in November, and is up 2 percent since November 2007.  So, despite the ups and downs of food and energy prices, inflation is running at about 2 percent.  This is a welcome respite from the 5.6 percent inflation rate seen at the end of July.

The drop in the inflation rate is disinflation.  Too many media outlets are jumping to the conclusion that the U.S. economy is experiencing deflation.  Thus far, the only areas where prices are falling are energy, transportation, and, to a lesser extent percentage-wise, housing.  Deflation is a threat, and it should be the government’s focus for now.  With the real money supply shrinking as banks continue to hoard cash and make borrowing difficult and expensive, we are headed toward a deflationary economic environment.  But this can be forestalled and possibly prevented by proper government intervention.

Fed Goes to Zero

Today, the Federal Reserve fired off the remainder of its interest rate arsenal in its campaign to defeat the recession by dropping its federal funds rate to a range between zero and .25 percent from 1 percent.  This is historic, not only because the target rate has never been this low, but also because the Fed has never used a range as its target.  The federal funds rate is the target rate at which banks may make short terms loans to each other.  Generally, once it sets the target, the Fed then manipulates the money supply until the market reaches the target rate. However, in the instant case, the effect of the Fed’s move will be limited (to the extent there is any at all), however, because the actual federal funds rate has been running at approximately .50 percent for the past month or so.  Last week, the rate on federal funds was .13 percent.  So, by lowering the rate, the Fed is merely acknowledging market conditions, rather than setting a new pace that will spur borrowing.  Especially now that the Fed rate is near zero, the Fed must consider and implement alternative policy tools to prop up the weak financial industry.  The goal for now is simply to avoid catastrophe.

In a rare media conference following the rate announcement, the Fed also noted that it would use its balance sheet as another weapon in the war on the recession.  What this refers to is an expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet through various types of lending, including the continuation of programs already begun, such as the Term Auction Facility, which has helped to bolster the commercial paper market by giving businesses access to short-term borrowing from the government.  The Fed further hinted that new lending programs will be forthcoming, and it will most likely purchase assets, such as mortgage-backed securities.

While all of these actions will help to put support under a sagging economy, the net effect also puts tremendous pressure on the value of the dollar.

Housing Starts Fall to New Lows

The other economic news of the day, which has been buried by the Fed’s announcement, was the startling drop in housing starts.  Granted, nothing negative in housing should be particularly surprising, but the speed of the decline in the construction industry does merit some attention. New construction starts dove 18.9 percent in November, which is the sharpest monthly percentage drop since March 1984, when housing starts dropped 26 percent.  The seasonally adjusted annual rate for housing starts of 625,000 marks the lowest rate since the Commerce Department began tracking records in 1959.  Starts for single-family homes also fell to a new low of a seasonally-adjusted annual rate estimate of 441,000, a 16.9 percent drop, in November.  Over the past year, housing starts have fallen 47 percent as an excessive inventory of homes dragged the builder sentiment index to an all-time low in December.

Posted in Credit Crisis, Economy, Finance, U.S. Dollar | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »