Raw Finance

Common sense economic and financial industry analysis for everyone, from banking and investment professionals to individual investors.

Archive for November, 2008

Happy Thanksgiving

Posted by rawfinance on November 26, 2008

I’ll save the dour economic news for another day.  We have enjoyed a nice rally in the stock market this week, the S&P 500 is up 18 percent from its low on November 20.  That’s a quick bounce, but then again this market has not wasted time moving up or down when the momentum gets going.  What used to be counted in months now happens in mere days, and sometimes hours.

It has been a brutal year for investing, but I see Thanksgiving as a good time to forgive ourselves and others for the damage that has been done and mistakes that have been made, be thankful for what we still have, and vow to be smarter going forward.  And I vow to be here to help.

I wish you and your family (even if it only extends to something furry) a warm and happy Thanksgiving.

-Gregg

Posted in Market Commentary | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Another $800 Billion in Treasury Facilities to Stem Crisis

Posted by rawfinance on November 25, 2008

One of the reasons the Great Depression was so great (awful would be more appropriate) is that the federal government took a “hands-off” approach to the banking crisis of the early 1930s and allowed the markets to find their way through the morass.  I am strongly in favor of minimal government intervention in free markets – in good times this is the best way to promote growth.  However, an economic crisis such as the one we currently face require active government involvement in order to ensure the stability of the financial system because without a financial system there is no economy.  Thus, the government must do whatever it can, and print as many dollars as necessary to keep the credit markets from seizing up entirely or, worse, collapsing and disappearing.

Today, the Federal Reserve announced it was throwing another $800 billion at the problem:

  • The Federal Reserve initiated a program to purchase  agency bonds as well as conforming mortgage-backed securities (MBS) backed by FannieMae, FreddieMac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB) in the secondary market: “This action is being taken to reduce the cost and increase the availability of credit for the purchase of houses, which in turn should support housing markets and foster improved conditions in financial markets more generally.” Purchases of up to $100 billion in GSE agency bonds will begin next week.  Purchases of up to $500 billion in MBS will be conducted by asset managers selected via a competitive process with a goal of beginning these purchases before year-end.
  • Under the new Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), the Fed will lend up to $200 billion on a non-recourse basis to holders of AAA-rated asset-backed securities (ABS) backed by “newly and recently originated” loans, such as for education, automobiles, credit cards and loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration.
  • The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) will lend an amount equal to the market value of the ABS less a haircut and will be secured at all times by the ABS.  The U.S. Treasury Department–under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA)–will provide $20 billion of credit protection to the FRBNY in connection with the TALF.

Only $20 billion comes from the EESA, the rest is new money on the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve, which is why no new legislation was necessary.  This new program directly attacks, for the first time, the core issue of the economic crisis, falling housing prices.  By buying good (not toxic) mortgages and other consumer credit the government frees up money to be lent and this should result in lower mortgage rates.

So this is welcome news and, so long as the program is implemented quickly and consistently, it should help shore up key parts of the credit markets.  But my reader must understand that these efforts merely stablize the crisis, they do not magically return us to where we were.  The Dow Jones Industrial Average is not going to pop back up to 14,000 tomorrow.  This is not a criticism of the program, it will hopefully do exactly what it is meant to do – that is keep us from economic ruin, but it cannot stave off a very deep and long recession that has already begun.  As far as your investing is concerned, you may want to trade on a possible holiday rally, but tread carefully, and make sure that you continue to preserve capital because the recovery is still a long way off.

Posted in Credit Crisis, Economy | Tagged: , | 3 Comments »

Economic Roundup (Week of 11-17-08 to 11-21-08): The New Vocabulary Word is “Stag-deflation”

Posted by rawfinance on November 24, 2008

The big economic news last week was the dramatic drop in the consumer and producer price indicies.  On November 18, 2008, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) announced:

The Producer Price Index [PPI] for Finished Goods fell 2.8 percent in October, seasonally adjusted, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. This decrease followed a 0.4-percent decline in September and a 0.9-percent fall in August. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods moved down 3.9 percent in October after declining 1.2 percent in September, and the crude goods index dropped 18.6 percent subsequent to a 7.9-percent decrease in the previous month.

The next day, the BLS issued the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for October 2008, stating:

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) decreased
1.0 percent in October, before seasonal adjustment, the Bureau of Labor
Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.  The October
level of 216.573 (1982-84=100) was 3.7 percent higher than in October
2007.

The big drop of 1 percent in one month reflected the cascading decline in commodities prices that began in July 2008 and has continued since as the world economy sinks further into recession.  This drop has sparked fears of deflation.  However, while the drop in consumer prices, most notably due to the drop in energy prices, may indicate a future continuation of a drop in prices for all goods, for now, it simply denotes disinflation, or a falling inflation rate.  Compared to October 2007, the CPI was up 3.7 percent.

In an article posted at RGEMonitor.com, Michael F. Bryan, vice president and senior economist in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, asserts that the ”drop-off in consumer prices seems to have been prompted by a number of factors, including some pass-through from sharply lower commodity prices, a stronger dollar (which makes import prices cheaper), and very soft consumer spending.”  Bryan concludes, “The overall and the core CPI posted declines for the month and clearly there is significant, rather broadly based downward pressure on retail prices. But as I cut the data, it looks to me that the October CPI data is pointing to an inflation rate somewhere in the 0.5 percent to 1.5 percent range.”  So, he sees a lower inflation rate (disinflation), but not deflation, but one should note that this is his conclusion based on the most recent report.  Bryan correctly concludes that one can only take so much away from one report.  We need several data points, or several negative PPI and CPI reports, to reach a reasoned conclusion that deflation is either on its way or has arrived.

Stag-deflation

Stag-deflation is an economic condition whereby economic growth is either at a standstill or showing very anemic growth while the economy suffers from a wage-price spiral, as consumer and business spending freezes and the monetary supply contracts.  There is a possibility that we could be heading for such a disaster, even with the federal government and central bank’s efforts.  Please note, as I have discussed above, there is no hard evidence of deflation yet, so this is only a possibility based on what appears to be the beginning of a trend.  I raise this now, so you may begin to prepare for it.

First, we need to take a look at some economic forecasts.  The International Monetary Fund recently posited

prospects for global growth have deteriorated over the past month.  World growth is projected to slow from 5% in 2007 to 3¾% in 2008 and to just over 2% in 2009, with the downturn led by advanced economies.  U.S. to contract (-0.7%) in 2009, after growth of 1.4% this year; Growth to be “particularly weak” in the G-7 countries — the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the U.K., Canada and Italy.  U.K. to contract (-1.3%) next year; Italy’s economy will contract in 2009 (-0.6%); Germany is expected contract in 2009 (-0.8%); France’s economy will contract in 2009 (-0.5%); ; Canada to grow 0.3% in 2009.  In emerging economies, growth is projected to slow appreciably but still reach 5% in 2009. However, these forecasts are based on current policies. Global action to support financial markets and provide further fiscal stimulus and monetary easing can help limit the decline in world growth. 2009 projections Brazil (3%), India (6.3%), Russia (3.5%), China(8.5%) [SOURCE: RGEMonitor.com].

There is no question that growth is stagnating, but what about deflation?  Professor Nouriel Roubini believes that stag-deflation is well under way.  He points to the rapid decline in commodities and housing prices and the rise in layoffs as signs of extreme pressure on prices of goods and services.  Specifically, Roubini notes:

signs of stag-deflation now are clear: we are in a severe recession and now the recent readings of both the PPI and the CPI are showing the beginning of deflation. Slack in goods markets with demand falling and supply being excessive (because of years of excessive overinvestment in new capacity in China, Asia and emerging market economies) means lower pricing power of firms and need to cut prices to sell the burgeoning inventory of unsold goods; slack in labor markets with sharp fall in employment and sharp rise in the unemployment rate means lower wage pressures and lower labor cost pressures; and slack in commodity markets – that have already fallen by 30% from their summer peaks and will fall another 20-30% in a global recession – means lower inflation and actual deflationary forces.

Falling prices may sound like a good development for consumers (like gas at $2/gallon instead of $4), however, deflation is a very dangerous animal, far worse than inflation, which is a natural result of economic growth.  Roubini outlines three dangerous effects of price deflation:

  1. Wages fall—as demand slips below supply, an employer must cut back costs and production to offset the drop in the prices it can receive for its products;
  2. Consumer spending drops—in an environment where prices are constantly falling, consumers have no incentive to spend (think of the housing market, why buy a house today if it is going to lose 10 percent or more of its value over the next year?)—so consumers wait to spend and that reduces demand causing prices to spiral downward;
  3. Real interest rates rise—even though the Fed lowers rates to stimulate the economy by making borrowing cheaper, borrowing actually becomes more expensive because future dollars are more expensive than present dollars in a deflationary environment.

Roubini explains the last phenomenon with this example:

Suppose you are a firm or household that had borrowed – say a 10 year mortgage or a 10 year corporate bond – at an interest rate (i) of 5% at the time when inflation (dP/P) was expected to remain at 3%; then the real ex-ante real cost of borrowing (r= i – dP/P) was only 2% (the difference between 5% and the expected inflation of 3%). Now suppose that, ex-post, the economy falls into a deflation trap and prices are now falling at 2% annual rate and expected to fall as much for a number of years. Now the ex-post real interest rate (r= i – dP/P) on that borrowing rises from 2% ex-ante to an actual ex-post 7% (5% – (-2%)). Thus, ex-post unexpected deflation sharply increases the real interest rate faced by borrowers or, equivalently, sharply increases the real ex-post value of their real liabilities (D/P).

Stag-deflation can be prevented, but the new administration is really going to have its hands full trying to battle this monster.  The new economic team will need to be creative, adventurous and proactive.  It may need to reverse policy from time-to-time on a dime.  It may need to be inconsistent.  This is one event where having a plan and conservatively sticking to it may not be the best course, and we, the consumers and investors, are going to need to be patient and cautious.

SOURCE: The Deadly Dirty D-Words: “Deflation”, “Debt Deflation” and “Defaults”. And How Central Banks Will Have to Resort to “Crazy” Policies as We Have Reached Such Bermuda Triangle of a “Liquidity Trap”, Nouriel Roubini, RGEMonitor.com

Posted in Economy | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

Forget Stock Market Outlooks, Watch the Economic Data

Posted by greggkilloren on November 20, 2008

I am working on some more in-depth posts on the state of the economy with some predictions as to where we might go from here.  Investing well in the stock market requires a study and understanding of economic data.  As we are all discovering this year, it is not enough to follow the crowd (sometimes it works, sometimes it is extremely dangerous – think about how many times this year the “smart money” declared a market bottom), one must always be ahead.  That means being aware of economic trends, like inflation and (gulp) deflation, interest rate movements, money supply, employment, manufacturing, shipping, trade agreements – basically the whole panoply that makes up the discipline of economics.  Now, not everyone can take the time and effort to become an accomplished economist.  However, as I have often noted, this blog is designed to lift that burden from your shoulders by giving you the information and analysis to help you with your personal financial decisions.  [Hint: In the near future, I may begin offering investment advisory services - details to come, please stay tuned.]

I should have the posts I’m working on up over the weekend, including the popular Economic Roundup.  In the meantime, please enjoy these stock market outlooks as compiled by RGE Monitor:

  • Citi: S&P and DJIA to end 2008 at 1200 and 10800, respectively, but S&P may touch 800 by yearend. The cash position of non-financial constituents of the S&P500 as a percent of their equity market capitalization is at about the same level seen after the 1987 crash and the 2000-02 sell-off, which provided some insight to a market bottom [GK: Anyone wonder why Citigroup's stock is headed to zero?]
  • ML: After RTC was established in 1989, it took 1 year for the stock market to bottom, 2 years for the economy to bottom, and 3 years for the housing market to bottom. Our new 12-month target for S&P 500 is 1248. Valuations are more attractive now but credit crisis worries will prevail
  • Hussman: Market hasn’t bottomed yet b/c recession is not yet broadly recognized [emphasis added]. Recession-induced bear markets tend to be longer, more drawn-out affairs than stand-alone bear markets [GK: This is dead on.]
  • Bear market rallies average 4 months on overconfidence that ‘worst is over’ [GK: There may yet be one coming, but volume is so light these days, I may have been wrong.  Instead, I think the rally already occurred between March and June 2008, and then again in August to mid-September]
  • Shares normally bottom ~5 months before end of recession (see Stock Markets and Recessions) [GK: Consider that and ask this question: Are we only 5 months from the end?]
  • BNP: Once recession commences, stock prices have on average fallen about 14% during first 6 months of recession. The longer the recession, the further the decline [GK: We can stop calling this an ordinary recession - no lending = no business = no jobs = no consumer spending = deflation = no stock market]
  • ING: Average return on S&P 500 has actually been higher in quarters of negative GDP growth than in quarters of low but positive growth
  • Bespoke: Average Nasdaq bear has been 216 days long for an average decline of 36.51% [GK: Nasdaq is currently down 49 percent for the year, there is nothing average about this situation.]

Posted in Economy | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Bank Lending in October Curtailed in All Areas

Posted by rawfinance on November 19, 2008

The monthly Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey conducted by the Federal Reserve showed that banks severely tightened their lending standards on all types of loans to businesses and consumers over the three-month period between July and October 2008.  The survey, sent to 55 domestic banks and 21 U.S. branches of foreign banks reported that banks had imposed stricter standards on commercial, industrial, commercial real estate, residential real estate and consumer loans.  In addition to the tighter standards, banks also reported that pricing terms of all types of loans had become more conservative.  The survey further notes that domestic banks moved to protect themselves from the uncertain economy by reducing credit limits on existing credit card account both to prime and nonprime borrowers.

The survey appears to show that the tightening of lending standards and pricing has led to two outcomes: (1) demand for all types of loans has dropped; and (2) borrowing against preexisting loan commitments has increased.  What can be reasonably inferred from the survey is that businesses and consumers are borrowing what they can while they can, and they are not seeking new loans, in part, because they no longer qualify or the pricing terms of the offered loan are no longer advantageous.  Also, the drop in loan demand may stem from a need to preserve capital and reduce debt.

In a recent post, I noted effect of the drop in housing prices and how it has effectively cut off the main source of household spending, home equity loans.  The Fed survey stated that a full 75 percent of loan officers said that their banks had stiffened standards that made it more difficult for borrowers to qualify for revolving home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), while 25 percent of respondents said demand for those HELOCs had weakened — twice the drop in demand that was reported in July.

Notably, a significant number of banks reportedly raised minimum required down payments, as well as spreads of loan rates, on many consumer loans. And half of banks indicated they had become either somewhat or much less willing to make consumer installment loans over the past three months.  This is proof of one of the reasons why there will not be a rebound in consumer spending.

As with other recent reports, we should keep in mind that these cover a time period in which the worst of the credit crisis was just beginning.  The economic reports for the period between October and December 2008 ought to show a severe economic decline due to the freezing of the credit markets that began in late September.

The Fed’s bank senior loan officer survey may read in full here.

Posted in Credit Crisis, Economy, Finance | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »