Raw Finance

Common sense economic and financial industry analysis for everyone, from banking and investment professionals to individual investors.

Roubini Skeptical About Results of European Bank Stress Tests

Posted by Gregg Killoren on July 29, 2010

In its weekly newsletter, Roubini Global Economics (RGE) reviews the results of the European bank stress tests that were released last week.  RGE, and other analysts, have pointed out that the stress tests did not include an event of a sovereign debt default.  It is clear that the stress tests were designed simply to reassure investors and not to truly examine how the banks could withstand real market stress.

Below, RGE’s newsletter is reproduced:

Greetings from RGE!

We’ve been digesting the results of European bank stress tests, which appear to have made neither markets nor analysts less stressed. According to the Committee of European Bank Supervisors (CEBS), only seven banks failed to pass muster out of the 91 tested. The CEBS also announced on July 23 that the recapitalization needs of the failures—five Spanish cajas, Germany’s Hypo Real Estate (HRE) and Greece’s ATEbank—amounted to €3.5 billion (US$4.5 billion).

Several aspects of the testing process make us skeptical about the results. We’re still not convinced of the European banking sector’s resilience and therefore are concerned about the scale of the potential liabilities that stressed sovereigns need to backstop amid a low-growth environment.

In a Strategy Flash  available exclusively to clients, we address a crucial deficiency of the stress tests: the absence of a sovereign default scenario. Optimistic commentators point to the rebound in U.S. markets after the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), which faced significant criticism, as Europe’s equivalent is now. But while the U.S. SCAP tests modeled the key concern of the market—future property risk—and forced banks to recapitalize, the European tests did neither. The former would have meant stress testing sovereign debt in a default scenario. The only valid argument for not doing so is that the ECB could monetize the debt, with the €440 billion European Financial Stabilization Facility (EFSF) serving as a fiscal fallback plan for sovereigns whose solvency concerns limit their bank backstopping capacity. But in the event of several sovereigns drawing on this fund—which we see as not entirely unlikely—the guarantees would be worthless.

We also take issue with the Tier 1 ratio of 6% the CEBS used, which we see as a poor benchmark that can hide hybrid instruments that have proven to lack loss absorption capacity on a going concern basis. What’s more, while only seven of the 91 lenders failed to pass this bar, there were at least 10 other marginal fails, with Tier 1 ratios of 6.3% or less. Had the threshold been 7%, 24 banks would have failed the test, notes an RGE Critical Issue  parsing the results.

The capital shortfall figure likewise warrants closer inspection: For Spain, it includes €14.4 billion of public funds committed and pre-approved before the stress tests. Effectively, the tests rely on ongoing government support (almost €200 billion in capital injections, amounting to 1.2% of the aggregate Tier 1 ratio) and sovereigns’ guaranteed backup from the EFSF and ultimately the ECB. But utilizing the EFSF, which was originally intended for liquidity support, for bank recapitalizations could expose the sovereign to refinancing risks and rising spreads. “In situations of insolvency,” Dr. Roubini asserts in a June 28 RGE Analysis , “official support not only fails to prevent the eventual default, but also exacerbates the trouble, causing more damage to the country and even to its creditors.”

Posted in Banking, Economy, European Union | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

July 2010 Fed Beige Book: Modest Activity; Tight Credit; No Wage Increases,

Posted by Gregg Killoren on July 28, 2010

The Federal Reserve Board’s Beige Book, an informal survey of economic conditions in the 12 Federal Banking Districts, generally showed continued economic growth in July, albeit at a slower pace—reflecting many other recent signs of a slowing of the recovery.  However, slower growth is still growth, and there are no clear signs of another recession.

The July Beige Book was weaker than recent Beige Book in at least one respect: two Districts, Atlanta and Chicago, reported a slowdown in the pace of economic activity.  The other Districts reported that economic activity increased slightly or held steady.  The problem areas remain the usual suspects: soft loan demand and tight credit; real estate; and lack of wage pressure.

Credit

Overall loan demand was reported as soft or weak in Cleveland, Atlanta, and Dallas, while total outstanding loan volume decreased in recent months in St. Louis but was steady in Philadelphia and San Francisco. Demand for commercial loans was flat to increasing in the Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Chicago, and Kansas City Districts; in contrast, St. Louis reported a decrease in commercial loans outstanding, while New York, Atlanta, and San Francisco reported restrained or decreasing demand in this lending category. Demand for consumer loans was weak in Cleveland and eased in Philadelphia; Atlanta and St. Louis indicated a decline in consumer lending; but demand for consumer loans increased in New York and Kansas City. Demand for residential mortgage loans eased in the Philadelphia District but increased in the New York District; Cleveland reported residential mortgage activity below expectations at given rates; and real estate lending decreased in St. Louis. Credit was limited for commercial real estate loans in Chicago, and demand fell for these loans in New York and Kansas City.

Real Estate

Nearly all Districts reported sluggish housing markets in the months since the homebuyer tax credit expired on April 30.  Commercial and industrial real estate markets continued to struggle in all twelve Districts. Overall, vacancy rates were flat to slightly increased and continued to exert downward pressure on rents. Developers reported difficult credit conditions in the Cleveland, Richmond, St. Louis, and Kansas City Districts, while the Dallas District reported a few developers going out of business. The outlook for commercial and industrial real estate across the Districts ranged from further declines in activity to slow growth.

Wages

Wage pressures remained largely contained across most Districts. Boston, Philadelphia, Richmond, Minneapolis, and San Francisco reported little or no change in wages, while Cleveland, Chicago, and Kansas City reported that wage pressures were small or remained subdued. Dallas reported that wage pressures were mostly nonexistent, with the exception of the airline industry.  While that may sound good for employers, the problem is that there is little wage pressure because there are too few jobs and too many people looking for work.

Please click the following link to view the full July 2010 Beige Book report: The Beige Book.

Posted in Beige Book, Economy | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

IRA Savings Decline Sharply: Report

Posted by Gregg Killoren on July 28, 2010

More than one-quarter of all retirement savings is held in individual retirement accounts (IRAs), yet most traditional IRA investors did not add money to their accounts in 2007, and even fewer did so in 2008, according to a report by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Investment Company Institute (ICI). IRAs account for $4.2 trillion in assets, and 11.2 percent of investors contributed in 2007, while 9.4 percent added to their accounts in 2008. According to the study, investors who regularly added money were the least likely to stop when the market tumbled in 2008, with 63 percent of those who contributed the previous year saying they continued making deposits.

IRAs are excellent vehicles for retirement savings, and with the future of government assistance in doubt and pensions being squeezed by the financial crisis, personal saving is more important than ever.  In addition, considering the tax-deferred advantages of IRAs in light of future tax rate increases, adding savings to IRAs makes more sense than ever.

To view the report, please click on the following link to the ICI website: The IRA Investor Profile.

Posted in Individual Retirement Accounts, Personal Finance | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

May 2010 Case-Shiller 20-City Home Price Index Up 4.6 Percent

Posted by Gregg Killoren on July 27, 2010

Data through May 2010, released today by Standard & Poor’s for its S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, show that the annual growth rates in 15 of the 20 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) and the 10- and 20-City Composites improved in May compared to those reported for April 2010. The 10-City Composite is up 5.4 percent and the 20-City Composite is up 4.6 percent from where they were in May 2009. While 19 MSAs and both Composites reported positive monthly changes in May over April, only 12 of the MSAs and the two Composites saw better month-over-month growth rates in May than those reported in April.

It seems the federal homebuyer tax credit, which expired at the end of April, but allowed closings to continue through June (that deadline was extended by Congress to the end of September due to the lengthy process of getting to closing these days), boosted prices.  However, what happens to prices in the absence of the tax credit, given big slips in mortgage applications and housing starts, may not be pretty.  So, the May numbers cannot be read as stabilization in the housing market, though on their face, that would appear to be the case.

David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s, stated in the report, “We need to watch where the housing markets will go after these temporary stimuli [the tax credit and the general strength of buying in Spring] go away. June’s existing and new home sales and housing starts data do not show much real improvement in those statistics either. It still looks possible that the housing market might bounce along the bottom for the foreseeable future, before showing any real improvement that will filter through to the rest of the economy.”

As of May 2010, average home prices across the United States are back to the levels where they were in the autumn of 2003. Measured from June/July 2006 through May 2010, the peak-to-date figures for the 10-City Composite and 20-City Composite are -29.6 percent and -29.1 percent, respectively.

Month-to-month gainers were headlined by Minneapolis, which rose 2.8 percent, and Atlanta, up 2 percent. All markets except Las Vegas, which declined 0.5 percent, were positive.

On a year-over-year basis, Las Vegas was the biggest decliner at 6.5 percent, and the biggest gainer was San Francisco at 18.3 percent.

San Diego continued to improve, with its 13th consecutive positive monthly increase. Miami and New York, the two markets that had declined in April, posted positive monthly changes in May 2010, increasing 0.9 percent and 0.8 percent, respectively.

For more information on the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, please click on the “Housing Statistics” page on the menu bar above or in the Pages list in the left-side column.

Posted in Economy, Housing | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

India Aggressively Raises Rates to Battle Inflation

Posted by Gregg Killoren on July 27, 2010

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has increased the reverse repo rate, the rate at which the central bank absorbs excess cash, by 50 basis points to 4.5 percent, surprising markets that had expected a 25 basis point rise. In line with most forecasts, the RBI also raised the repo rate, the rate at which it lends to commercial banks, by 25 basis points to 5.75 percent.  The move is focused on reigning in inflation, which has risen at double-digit rates for five months.

“The dominant concern that has shaped the monetary policy stance in this review is high inflation,” the central bank said in a statement. “With growth taking firm hold, the balance of policy stance has to shift decisively to containing inflation and anchoring inflationary expectations.”  The RBI’s hope is to bring inflation down to a 6 percent annual growth rate by early 2011.

While the RBI revised its GDP growth outlook for 2010-11 to 8.5 percent from 8.0 percent, the central bank noted its concern “that if the global recovery falters, the performance of emerging market economies is likely to be adversely affected, and a widespread slowdown in global trade will have an impact on the Indian manufacturing and service sectors too.” Local Indian business groups have warned against moves to raise rates on concern that the reduced liquidity would hurt India’s fast-growing economy.

The press release from the RBI is reproduced below:

First Quarter Review of Monetary Policy 2010-11: Press Statement by Dr. D. Subbarao, Governor

“This morning, the Reserve Bank released the First Quarter Review of Monetary Policy for 2010-11 at a meeting of the chief executives of major banks. The important decisions contained in the review were to raise the repo rate from 5.5 per cent to 5.75 per cent and the reverse repo rate from 4 per cent to 4.50 per cent.  This asymmetric raise in rates narrows the LAF corridor from 150 basis points to 125 basis points.

Balance of Policy Stance

2.   The dominant concern that has shaped the monetary policy stance in this review is high inflation. Even as food price inflation and, more generally, consumer price inflation, have shown some moderation, they are still in double digits. Non-food inflation has risen, and demand side pressures are clearly evident. With growth taking firm hold, the balance of policy stance has to shift decisively to containing inflation and anchoring inflationary expectations.

Global Outlook

3.  Since our last policy review in April, the macroeconomic environment has changed significantly. In the aftermath of the Greek sovereign debt crisis and other visible soft spots in Europe and the US, there is renewed uncertainty about the sustainability of the recovery. In contrast, EMEs are witnessing strong growth, driven by rising domestic demand, restocking of inventories and, thus far, recovering global trade. The relatively rapid recovery in EMEs has also been accompanied by higher inflation. Overall, though, there is widespread expectation of a slowdown of the global economy in the second half of 2010.

Indian Economy

Growth

4.  The macroeconomic developments in India are contrarian to the global trend. We have recovered faster, but our inflation rate has also been higher. The recovery process has consolidated and become more broad-based since April 2010. A big ‘known unknown’ in April 2010 was the outlook on monsoon. That has since become a ‘known known’ in the sense that rainfall so far has been better than during last year, and the crop-wise area sown and the distribution of rainfall offer scope for cautious optimism on the agricultural front.

5.  Better farm sector prospects should lead to a pick-up in rural demand. This should give further momentum to the performance of the industrial sector which has been growing firmly. The strength of the recovery is also reflected in the sales and profitability growth of the corporate sector with more investment intentions being translated into action across a range of sectors. While domestic drivers of growth are robust, any slowdown in the global recovery will affect all EMEs, including India.

6.  Taking into account the above factors, the projection for real GDP growth for 2010-11 is revised to 8.5 per cent, up from our April policy projection of 8.0 per cent with an upside bias. This upward revision is primarily based on better industrial production and its favourable impact on the services sector while giving due consideration to the global scenario.

Inflation

7.  The developments on the inflation front are, however, worrisome. Let me explain. WPI inflation has been in double digits since February 2010. Primary food articles inflation, despite some moderation, continues to be in double digits. Between November 2009 and June 2010, non-food inflation rose from zero to 10.6 per cent and non-food manufactured inflation from zero to 7.3 per cent. Significantly, non-food items contributed over 70 per cent to WPI inflation in June 2010, suggesting that inflation is now very much generalised. Inflation in terms of all four consumer price indices remains in double digits notwithstanding some decline in recent months.

8.  Going forward, the outlook on inflation will be shaped by: (i) the monsoon performance for the remaining period; (ii) movements in global energy and commodity prices, which have been showing distinct signs of softening over the past few weeks; and (iii) potential build-up in demand-side pressures with the strengthening of domestic growth drivers.

9.  Taking into account the emerging domestic and external scenario, the baseline projection for WPI inflation for March 2011 has been raised to 6.0 per cent from our April policy projection of 5.5 per cent.

Monetary Aggregates

10. It is expected that even with the higher growth projection, monetary aggregates will evolve along the projected trajectory indicated in the April policy statement. Accordingly, for policy purposes, we have retained the earlier projections of money supply (M3) at 17 per cent and of non-food bank credit growth at 20 per cent.

Risk Factors

11.  Let me indicate some important risks to the growth and inflation outlook.

  • The first risk factor is that if the global recovery falters, the performance of EMEs is likely to be adversely affected, and a widespread slowdown in global trade will have an impact on the Indian manufacturing and service sectors too.
  • The second risk factor is that an uncertain global situation will  significantly reduce the flow of capital into EMEs. Such a slowdown in capital inflows will constrain domestic investment which is critical to achieving and sustaining high growth rates. This could potentially be a problem in India too since our rapid recovery has resulted in a widening of the current account deficit.
  • It must be recognised though that the risk of capital flows runs both ways. It is quite possible that EMEs, including India, will receive more flows than they need because of accommodative monetary policies of advanced country central banks for an extended period. Large capital inflows above the absorptive capacity of our economy will pose a challenge for monetary and exchange rate management, and also have implications for asset prices. In this scenario, a widening current account deficit will help absorb a larger proportion of the inflows.
  • The third risk factor is on the inflation front.  Softening of inflation in the months ahead is contingent on moderation of food prices which in turn will depend on a balanced spatial andtemporal distribution of rainfall in the remaining period of this monsoon season.
  • While on risk factors, we must note one important upside.  If global growth does not pick up, commodity and energy prices will remain subdued.  Furthermore, unutilised global capacity in several sectors will soften the prices of imports and put downward pressure on import substitutes.

Monetary Policy Stance

12. The Reserve Bank began the reversal of its expansionary monetary policy in October 2009 and has calibrated the exit to India’s specific growth-inflation dynamics. Today’s policy action in particular has been informed by three major considerations:

(i) domestic economic recovery is firmly in place and is strengthening;

(ii) there is a need to contain the demand-side inflationary pressures which are clearly evident; and

(iii) despite the increase in the policy rates by 75 basis points cumulatively, it is imperative that we continue in the direction of normalising our policy instruments to a level consistent with the evolving growth and inflation scenario, while taking care not to disrupt the recovery.

13. Our monetary policy actions are expected to:

i) Moderate inflation by reining in demand pressures and inflationary expectations.

ii) Maintain financial conditions conducive to sustaining growth.

iii) Generate liquidity conditions consistent with more effective transmission of policy actions.

iv) Restrict the volatility of short-term rates to a narrower corridor.

Operating Procedures of Monetary Policy

14.  Now let me turn to two new initiatives – one structural and the other on policy review and communication.

15.  The Reserve Bank’s LAF operates in such a manner that as systemic liquidity alternates between surplus and deficit, even at the margin, the overnight call money rate alternates between the reverse repo rate and the repo rate. As the systemic liquidity transits from a uni-directional surplus mode to a bi-directional mode, it will have implications for the effectiveness of monetary transmission. In the context of the changing liquidity dynamics, the operation of the LAF needs to be studied.  Accordingly, it is proposed to set up a Working Group to review the current operating procedure of monetary policy of the Reserve Bank, including the LAF.

Mid-Quarter Review of Monetary Policy

16. The second new initiative relates to a more frequent policy review. While our scheduled policy announcements are quarterly, in recent years, there have been several occasions, including March and July 2010, when we had to take off-cycle monetary policy actions. One significant advantage of the quarterly schedule is that it allows us to bring the full range of inputs into the decision-making process. Nevertheless, in a rapidly evolving macroeconomic situation, we need to combine the rigour and comprehensiveness of the quarterly process with the responsiveness and flexibility of more frequent reviews. Accordingly, the Reserve Bank will now undertake mid-quarter reviews roughly at the interval of about one and half months after each quarterly review. As per schedule, mid-quarter reviews will be in June, September, December and March.  They will be by way of a press release and will communicate our assessment of economic conditions more frequently, and will provide a rationale for either policy action or maintenance of the status quo. However, the Reserve Bank will have the flexibility, as always, to take swift and pre-emptive policy action, as and when warranted by the evolving macroeconomic developments.

Discussions with Banks

17. Banks welcomed the Reserve Bank’s policy stance. They agreed that the monetary measures announced by the Reserve Bank today were appropriate in light of the current global and domestic balance.  They also indicated that credit growth has picked up, though it is yet to become broad-based. Apart from monetary measures, discussions with banks focused on four specific issues viz., (i) liquidity situation and the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) corridor; (ii) Basel III norms; (iii) credit flows to micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs); and (iv) base rate. Banks indicated that the liquidity situation may remain tight for some more time as deposit growth has lagged behind the credit growth. They felt that a narrower LAF corridor will restrict short-term interest rate volatility and improve monetary transmission. Banks mentioned that the impact of Basel III norms on Indian banks will not be significant.  However, statutory liquidity ratio (SLR) assets need to be included in the liquidity coverage ratio. Credit portfolio in respect of MSMEs sector of many banks is growing at a rapid rate.  The Reserve Bank emphasised that the pace of credit expansion to MSMEs should be sustained and banks should sensitise the frontline managers the importance of lending to MSMEs. Banks indicated that the transition to the base rate has been generally smooth, though there are issues relating to the existing loans.”

G. Raghuraj
Deputy General Manager

Press Release : 2010-2011/140

Posted in Central Banks, Economy, India, Reserve Bank of India | Tagged: , , , | 2 Comments »